Is subfibular ossicle excision necessary in the modified Brostr?m procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability?
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210809-00371
- VernacularTitle:改良Brostr?m术治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳定中是否需要切除腓骨小体
- Author:
Ruokun HUANG
1
;
Wenjie HUANG
;
Bo LEI
;
Feng LIU
;
Kai XIAO
;
Hao PAN
;
Ming XIE
;
Junwen WANG
Author Information
1. 武汉市第四医院，华中科技大学同济医学院附属普爱医院足踝外科，武汉 430033
- Keywords:
Lateral ligament, ankle;
Joint instability;
Sprains and strains;
Modified Brostr?m procedure;
Subfibular ossicle
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2022;24(7):624-628
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of subfibular ossicle excision on the clinical efficacy of Brostr?m procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).Methods:From March 2014 to December 2018, 76 patients were treated by the modified Brostr?m procedure using the suture anchor technique for CLAI at Department of Foot & Ankle Surgery, Wuhan Fourth Hospital. Of them, 33 had subfibular ossicles (SFO group) and 43 did not (NSFO group). In the SFO group, there were 19 males and 14 females, aged (28.4±8.6) years; in the NSFO group, there were 21 males and 22 females, aged (27.8±7.4) years. Subfibular ossicles were excised in the SFO group. The 2 groups were compared in terms of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores at preoperation and the final follow-up.Results:The 2 groups were comparable due to insignificant differences between them in their preoperative general data ( P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 24 to 72 months (average, 28 months). The AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores improved significantly from 54.5±3.4 to 95.7±2.1 in the SFO group and significantly from 56.2±2.7 to 95.2±2.4 in the NSFO group at the final follow-up; the VAS scores reduced significantly from 5.7±1.8 to 1.6±1.4 in the SFO group and significantly from 5.7±1.6 to 1.7±1.2 in the NSFO group at the final follow-up (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of AOFAS or VAS scores at the final follow-up ( P>0.05). Conclusion:Since the modified Brostr?m procedure plus subfibular ossicle excision may result in similar good clinical efficacy as merely the modified Brostr?m procedure may for the CLAI patients without subfibular ossicle, subfibular ossicle excision should be suggested for the CLAI patients with subfibular ossicle.
