Efficacy of miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation assisted by preoperative digital design in the treatment of comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture
10.3760/cma.j.cn501098-20220712-00494
- VernacularTitle:数字化术前设计辅助微型钢板联合重建接骨板内固定治疗粉碎性髋臼后壁骨折的疗效
- Author:
Jianan CHEN
1
;
Zhixun FANG
;
Xi KE
;
Guodong WANG
;
Ximing LIU
Author Information
1. 解放军中部战区总医院骨科，武汉 430070
- Keywords:
Acetabulum;
Fracture fixation, internal;
Printing, three-dimensional;
Therapy, computer-assisted
- From:
Chinese Journal of Trauma
2022;38(10):897-903
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the clinical effect of miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation assisted by preoperative digital design and conventional miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation in the treatment of comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was used to analyze the clinical data of 35 patients with comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture admitted to General Hospital of Central Theater Command of PLA from January 2012 to June 2019, including 26 males and 9 females, aged 25-63 years [(45.5±9.8)years]. A total of 16 patients received miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation assisted by preoperative digital design (digital design group) and 19 patients received conventional miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation (conventional group). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization time and fracture healing time were compared in the two groups. Matta radiological standard score was performed to assess the quality of fracture reduction at postoperative 2 days. Modified Merle d′Aubign-Postel score was used to evaluate hip function at postoperative 3 months, 6 months and final follow-up. Postoperative complications were observed.Results:All patients were followed up for 12-48 months [(30.1±8.9)months]. The operation time and intraoperative blood loss were (114.7±16.1)minutes and (323.4±26.1)ml in digital design group, significantly less than (179.8±67.3)minutes and (392.6±87.8)ml in conventional group (all P<0.01). There were no significant differences in hospitalization time, fracture healing time, excellent and good rate of quality of fracture reduction between the two groups (all P>0.05). The modified Merle d′Aubign-Postel score was higher in digital design group [(14.1±2.3)points, (15.4±2.3)points and (17.1±1.8)points] than those in conventional group [(13.7±2.2)points, (15.0±2.5)points and (16.8±2.1)points] at 3 months, 6 months and last follow-up, but there were no significant differences (all P>0.05). The modified Merle d′Aubign-Postel score showed significant differences within each group at each time point (all P<0.01). In digital design group, one patient was found with heterotopic ossification and one with traumatic arthritis. In conventional group, two patients were found with heterotopic ossification, one with traumatic arthritis and one with avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The rate of postoperative complications was 12.5% (2/16) in digital design group and was 21.1% (4/19) in conventional group ( P>0.05). Neither of the two groups had complications such as penetration of screws into the articular cavity, failure of internal fixation or iatrogenic sciatic nerve injury. Conclusion:Both miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation assisted by preoperative digital design and conventional miniplates plus reconstruction plate fixation can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of comminuted posterior acetabular wall fracture, but the former can significantly reduce operation time and intraoperative blood loss.
