Efficacy and compliance of e-aid cognitive behavioral therapy in patients with situational insomnia among different age groups
10.3760/cma.j.cn371468-20211116-00661
- VernacularTitle:在线认知行为治疗对不同年龄段情境性失眠患者的疗效和依从性研究
- Author:
Yan XU
1
;
Shufei ZENG
;
Chenxi ZHANG
;
Likai XIE
;
Lianhong LIN
;
Lili ZHANG
;
Xingchang LIU
;
Bin ZHANG
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学南方医院精神心理科，广州 510515
- Keywords:
Situational insomnia;
e-aid cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (eCBTI);
Age group;
Compliance;
Efficacy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
2022;31(9):846-851
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the efficacy and compliance of e-aid cognitive behavioral therapy (eCBTI) in patients with situational insomnia among different age groups.Methods:A total of 194 patients with situational insomnia were recruited via a campaign of the " Prevention and Protection Handbook Against Epidemic" from March to April 2020 in Guangzhou, China.Participants were divided into two groups according to age: under 35 years old ( n=87) and 35 years old and above ( n=107). They all received one-week eCBTI intervention.Insomnia severity index (ISI), Pre-sleep arousal scale (PSAS) and Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) were used to evaluate the severity of insomnia for all participants pre- and post-intervention.The change of each scale within the group and the reduction rate of each scale between groups were compared using t test and one-way ANOVA. Results:(1) Intervention efficacy: in the <35-year-old group, compared with baseline, the scores of ISI scale ((9.2±4.1), (14.8±5.1)), PSAS cognitive arousal subscale ((18.5±8.4), (23.5±6.6)), PSAS((34.3±15.8), (40.3±10.7)), HADS depression subscale ((5.8±3.6), (8.5±4.6)) and HADS anxiety subscale((7.1±3.9), (9.5±4.5) )were statistically significant after eCBTI intervention ( t= 2.88-8.80, all P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in score of PSAS body subscale ((15.8±7.8), (16.8±5.7)). In ≥35-year-old group, compared with baseline, the scores of ISI scale ((9.7±4.2), (14.4±4.3)), HADS depression subscale ((4.6±2.2), (6.6±3.5))and PSAS cognitive arousal subscale ((16.9 ±8.5), (20.0±5.8))were significantly different after intervention ( t= 2.90-6.86, all P<0.01), meanwhile the scores of PSAS body subscale ((14.3±8.0), (13.9±5.2)), PSAS((32.2±16.5), (33.9±9.2)), HADS anxiety subscale((6.1±3.2), (7.0±3.5)) were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the score reduction rate between the two groups before and after intervention (all P>0.05). (2) Compliance: 86 cases dropped out, and the dropout rate was 61.3%.Totally 75 cases (38.7%) completed the 7-day treatment, and 119 cases (61.3%) completed the treatment within 1-6 days.Further study found that there was statistically significant difference in the reduction rate of ISI total score among the three groups with excellent, good and poor compliance ( F=5.655, P=0.004). Conclusion:eCBTI has a good effect on situational insomnia in different age groups, and there is no difference in treatment compliance.
