Clinical effect of percutaneous coronary intervention in maintenance hemodialysis patients combined with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20220507-00402
- VernacularTitle:维持血液透析合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行冠状动脉介入治疗临床效果观察
- Author:
Mingliang DU
1
;
Hailong LIN
Author Information
1. 大连市中心医院心血管内科，大连 116033
- Keywords:
Hemodiafiltration;
Percutaneous coronary intervention;
Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2022;45(11):979-984
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the safety and efficiency of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in maintenance hemodialysis patients combined with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).Methods:The clinical data of 52 maintenance hemodialysis patients combined with NSTE-ACS from January 2010 to January 2015 in Dalian Central Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among of them, 25 patients were treated with common drugs (control group), and 27 patients were treated with common drugs combined with PCI (PCI group). The major adverse cardiac events (MACE) duration of hospital stay were record, including hemorrhage, malignant arrhythmia, new heart failure or aggravation, stroke and all-cause death. The dialysis complications within 1 month after treatment were recorded, including hypotension, arrhythmia, heart failure and angina pectoris. The patients were followed up for 12 months, the MACE 1, 6 and 12 months after treatment were recorded, including angina pectoris, heart failure and cardiac death.Results:Duration of hospital stay, the incidences of malignant arrhythmia and new heart failure or aggravation in PCI group were significantly lower than those in control group: 18.5% (5/27) vs. 44.0% (11/25) and 7.4% (2/27) vs. 32.0% (8/25), and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05); there were no statistical difference in the incidences of hemorrhage, stroke and all-cause death between the two groups ( P>0.05). The incidences of dialysis complications such as hypotension, arrhythmia, heart failure and angina pectoris within 1 month after treatment in PCI group were significantly lower than those in control group: 24.0% (6/25) vs. 56.5% (13/23), 16.0% (4/25) vs. 43.5% (10/23), 12.0% (3/25) vs. 47.8% (11/23) and 24.0% (6/25) vs. 52.2% (12/23), and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05 or <0.01). The follow-up results showed that the incidences of angina pectoris and heart failure 1, 6 and 12 months after treatment in PCI group were significantly lower than those in control group, angina pectoris: 28.0% (7/25) vs. 65.2% (15/23), 29.2% (7/24) vs. 76.2% (16/21) and 43.5% (10/23) vs. 17/17, heart failure: 16.0% (4/25) vs. 43.5% (10/23), 8.3% (2/24) vs. 33.3% (7/21) and 21.7% (5/23) vs. 10/17, and there were statistical differences ( P<0.05 or <0.01); there was no statistical difference in the incidence of cardiac death 1 and 6 months after treatment between two groups ( P>0.05), the incidence of cardiogenic death 12 months after treatment in PCI group was significantly lower than that in control group: 8.6% (2/23) vs. 9/17, and there was statistical difference ( P<0.01). Conclusions:PCI is safe and effective for maintenance hemodialysis patients combined with NSTE-ACS.
