The observation on the effect of prospective intervention on emergence agitation and postoperative recovery in patients with chronic sinusitis during preoperative visits
10.3760/cma.j.cn115455-20210324-00424
- VernacularTitle:术前访视时前瞻性干预对慢性鼻窦炎手术患者全身麻醉苏醒期躁动和术后恢复的影响
- Author:
Jianbo LIU
1
;
Wei ZHANG
;
He HU
;
Jiangang CAO
;
Chao LIU
;
Zeyu ZHAO
;
Haigang YANG
;
Jiming CHENG
Author Information
1. 成都市大邑县人民医院麻醉科，成都 611330
- Keywords:
Sinusitis;
Surgical procedures, operative;
Postanesthesia nursing;
Agitation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2022;45(8):717-720
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of prospective intervention on emergence agitation and postoperative recovery in patients with chronic sinusitis during preoperative visits.Methods:A total of 80 patients with chronic sinusitis who underwent general anesthesia in Dayi County People′s Hospital of Chengdu City from December 2019 to October 2020 were selected and randomly divided into group D and group G, with 40 patients in each group. Group D received preoperative visit with conventional methods and group G received preoperative visit with prospective intervention methods. The hemodynamic changes of patients in the two groups at 30 min before the operation (T 1) and 1 (T 2), 5 (T 3), 10 (T 4) and 30 min (T 5) after tracheal tube extraction were recorded. The anxiety and depression scores of patients before the intervention and 1 d after the operation were compared between the two groups. The incidence of emergence agitation after the operation and complications during anesthesia awakening period were observed in the two groups, sino-nasal outcome test-20 (SNOT-20) was used to assess the postoperative recovery. Results:The incidence of emergence agitation in group G was lower than that in group D: 7.5%(3/40) vs. 25.0%(10/40), the difference was statistically significant ( χ2 = 4.50, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate between the two groups at T 1 and T 5 ( P>0.05), but the level of above indicators in group G at T 2, T 3 and T 4 were significantly higher than those in group D ( P<0.05). The scores of State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(S-AI) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) in group G at the first day after the operation were significantly lower than those in group D: (35.45 ± 5.32) scores vs. (39.35 ± 4.91) scores, (35.42 ± 7.82) scores vs. (38.76 ± 5.21) scores, the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). The incidence of complications during anesthesia awakening period in group G was slightly lower than that in group D ( P>0.05). After the operation, the scores of sinusitis symptoms and nasal symptoms in the two groups were significantly decreased compared with those before the operation, and the scores of group G were significantly lower than those in group D ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Prospective intervention before anesthesia in patients with chronic sinusitis surgery can reduce stress response, improve bad mood, reduce the incidence of emergence agitation, and promote the postoperative recovery.
