Application and evaluation of multi-sensory stimulation therapy in agitation behavior of patients with Alzheimer′s disease
10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20220210-00336
- VernacularTitle:多感官刺激疗法在阿尔茨海默病患者激越行为中的应用及评价
- Author:
Cuijing LI
1
;
Hong CHANG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学护理学院，北京 100069
- Keywords:
Alzheimer′s disease, dementia;
Multi-sensory stimulation;
Agitation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2022;38(33):2618-2624
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of multi-sensory stimulation therapy on agitation behavior in patients with Alzheimer's disease(AD).Methods:A total of 45 patients with AD hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, from June 2021 to January 2022 were selected, including 23 cases in the control group and 22 cases in the experimental group. The control group was treated with routine nursing methods, and the experimental group was treated with multi-sensory stimulation. The scores of Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) and Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer′s Disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment.Results:CMAI comparison showed that after the intervention, the CMAI scores of the experimental group and the control group was 33.14 ± 3.72 and 37.13 ± 7.23 respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( t=-2.34, P<0.05). The total score of "physical non aggressive behavior" and "language non aggressive behavior" in the experimental group were (11.09±2.91), (5.73±2.16), which were lower than those in the control group (13.57±4.33), (8.22±2.71). The differences were statistically significant ( t=-2.26,-3.39, P<0.05). The BEHAVE-AD scores of the experimental group before and after the intervention were (13.14 ± 9.54), (9.50 ± 4.81), in the control group were (11.04 ± 8.34), (10.70 ± 9.81). There was significant difference in BEHAVE-AD score before and after the intervention in the experimental group ( t=2.21, P<0.05), but there was no significant difference compared with the control group ( t=-0.73, P>0.05). "Behavior disorder" of the experimental group improved significantly after the intervention, and the score was (2.41 ± 1.26) compared with the control group (4.48 ± 2.87), the difference was statistically significant ( t=-3.10, P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with routine nursing, visual + auditory + tactile multi-sensory stimulation can improve the agitation behavior of AD patients, especially non aggressive agitation behavior, which has certain clinical significance and can provide reference for future related research.
