Effect of septic shock rapid response group on compliance with hour-1 bundle therapy strategy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.11.004
- VernacularTitle:脓毒性休克快速反应小组对1 h集束化治疗策略实施依从性的影响
- Author:
Peng ZHENG
1
;
Zhiwei GAO
;
Qingsong SUN
;
Liang XU
;
Shouxiang XIE
;
Hongmei ZHAO
;
Hong SUN
;
Jie ZHEN
Author Information
1. 淮安市第一人民医院急诊科，淮安 223300
- Keywords:
Shock;
Septic;
Rapid response team;
Hour-1 bundle strategy;
Emergency medical services;
Compliance
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2022;31(11):1457-1462
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the effect of septic shock rapid response team (SSRRT) on the compliance and prognosis of hour-1 bundle therapy strategy in emergency department patients with septic shock.Methods:This study was conducted on emergency patients with septic shock who were admitted to Huai’an First Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were emergency patients with septic shock who met the international guideline for surviving sepsis campaigns (Sepsis 3.0). Exclusion criteria: age<18 years, pregnant patients, patients transferred from another hospital who had received fluid resuscitation and/or vasoactive drugs, patients requiring emergency surgery, patients with emergency detention time<1 h, patients who refused to place central venous catheterization or had contraindications for catheterization, and patients who refused to give informed consent. SSRRT was established in January 2021. According to the establishment of SSRRT, patients were divided into the pre-SSRRT intervention group and the post-SSRRT intervention group. The general clinical data of the enrolled patients were collected, including vital signs, lactate, fluid resuscitation volume, maximum vasoactive drug pumping rate at the diagnosis of septic shock, implementation of hour-1 bundle therapy strategies, and ICU and 28-day mortality. Statistical software SPSS 25.0 was used. Pearson chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables between groups, and Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables between groups.Results:A total of 289 emergency patients met the inclusion criteria, 115 patients were excluded, and 174 patients were eventually included, including 83 patients in the pre-SSRRT group and 91 patients in the post-SSRRT group. Compared with the pre-SSRRT group, the proportion of lactate monitoring (54.2% vs. 100.0%, P<0.001), blood culture (27.7% vs. 93.4%, P<0.001), antibiotics (57.8% vs. 97.8%, P<0.001), fluid resuscitation volume ≥ 30 mL/kg (4.8% vs. 34.1%, P<0.001), and mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg (49.4% vs. 68.1%, P<0.001) were significantly increased. There was no significant difference in ICU mortality (50.6% vs. 37.4%, P=0.079) or 28-day mortality (53.0% vs. 38.5%, P=0.054) between the two groups. Conclusions:SSRRT can significantly improve the compliance of hour-1 bundle therapy strategy implementation in patients with emergency septic shock, and has a trend of decreasing mortality.
