Evaluation value of Karnofsky performance score for prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.11.003
- VernacularTitle:卡诺夫斯基健康状况量表评分对老年脓毒症患者预后的评估价值
- Author:
Xiaozhou LI
1
;
Zeliang QIU
;
Guangkuo ZHAO
;
Xingqi DENG
Author Information
1. 上海市健康医学院附属周浦医院急诊重症医学部，上海 201318
- Keywords:
KPS score;
Sepsis;
Prognosis evaluation;
Elderly patient
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2022;31(11):1451-1456
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the prognostic value of Karnofsky performance scores (KPS) in elderly patients with sepsis, so as provide a basis for clinical evaluation of the condition, prognosis and corresponding treatment measures.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted to collect the general information, clinical data, and follow-up data of limb motor function status and self-care ability of elderly patients with sepsis who were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of our hospital from January 2018 to June 2021. Patients were divided into the survival group and death group according to whether they survived the hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed using t-test, chi-square test, and Mann-Whitney test. The KPS score before admission, disease severity scores (APACHEⅡ and SOFA), serum procalcitonin (PCT), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and arterial blood lactate level on admission were compared between the two groups. Then, the factors with significance in univariate analysis were analyzed by Logistic regression method, the independent risk factors for predicting in-hospital mortality were determined, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the prognostic value of KPS score in elderly patients with sepsis.Results:A total of 135 patients were collected. There were 85 males and 50 females, 60 died and 75 survived during hospitalization, with a mortality rate of 44.4%. The preadmission KPS score of elderly patients with sepsis in the death group was significantly lower than that in the survival group [30 (30, 40) vs. 70 (50, 90), P<0.001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that KPS score ( OR=0.938, 95% CI: 0.914-0.963, P<0.001), SOFA score ( OR=1.255, 95% CI: 1.066-1.451, P=0.002) and arterial blood lactate ( OR=1.219, 95% CI: 1.059-1.404, P=0.006) were independent risk factors for predicting the prognosis during hospitalization. ROC curve analysis of mortality showed that compared with SOFA score and blood lactate, the area under the curve of KPS score was the largest, with AUC of 0.830 (95% CI: 0.756-0.890, P<0.001). In addition, the combination of KPS, SOFA and blood lactate had a greater predictive value for the prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis than that of the single index, with an AUC of 0.883 (95% CI: 0.826-0.940, P<0.001). Conclusions:The lower the KPS score, the worse the prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis. The KPS score can be used as a clinical indicator to predict the prognosis of elderly patients with sepsis.
