Evaluating value of modified critical care ultrasonic examination scheme for the etiological diagnosis of various shock in ICU patients
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2022.07.020
- VernacularTitle:改良重症超声快速管理方案在休克患者病因诊断中的作用
- Author:
Xueyan ZHANG
1
;
Zhifeng LI
;
Haibo WANG
;
Bingyu QIN
;
Rongqin DAI
Author Information
1. 河南省人民医院重症医学科，郑州 450000
- Keywords:
Critical ultrasound;
M-CCUE scheme;
Shock;
Etiological diagnosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
2022;31(7):952-956
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:The purpose of this study was to investigate the evaluating value of modified critical care ultrasonic examination(M-CCUE) scheme for the etiological diagnosis of shock in ICU patients.Methods:The prospective study collected relevant clinical data of various shock patients admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital from May 2020 to July 2021, including hemodynamic、blood indicators、organ/tissue perfusion and prognostic evaluation indicators.All selected patients completed the initial M-CCUE assessment within 30 minutes, were scored according to the M-CCUE score system and related data results were analyzed.Results:Ninety-three patients were included in this study,Two of them were not completed the M-CCUE assessment due to emergency treatment immediately after entering our department, and five were excluded due to inconsistent ultrasound judgments by the two physicians. In the end, a total of 86 patients were enrolled in the group. In patients applied with M-CCUE scheme,time to preliminary diagnosis and final diagnosis were (13.02±3.15)min and (67.70±20.20)min respectively, the accuracy of diagnosis was 83.7%. Among them, distributed shock accounted for 60.4%, hypovolemic shock accounted for 25.6%, cardiogenic shock and obstructive shock accounted for 3.5%, and mixed shock accounted for 7%; MCS is (13.27±4.91), M-CCUE scheme had the high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of distributed shock (sensitivity 91.2%, specificity 93.9%), hypovolemic shock (sensitivity 96.0%, specificity 96.7%), cardiogenic shock (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 98.7%) and obstructive shock (sensitivity 60.0%, specificity 100%); MCS has a good positive correlation with APACHEⅡ score ( r=0.861, P<0.001), and has no correlation with ICU cost ( r=0.012, P=0.915). There is no significant difference in MCS between the 28d death group and the recovery group ( P=0.391). Conclusions:For shock patients admitted to ICU with unknown etiology, the initial diagnosis of the cause of the M-CCUE program takes less time, has a higher correct diagnosis rate, sensitivity and specificity, and its quantitative evaluation results can predict the patient's criticality.
