Relationship between drainage diameter and prognosis of patients with thoracic trauma during closed thoracic drainage
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20220606-00192
- VernacularTitle:胸腔闭式引流术中引流管径大小与胸外伤患者预后的关系
- Author:
Shaowei FAN
1
;
Tao LI
;
Tongyi XU
Author Information
1. 海军第971医院心血管胸外科，青岛 266071
- Keywords:
Drainage;
Prognosis;
Risk factors;
Closed thoracic drainage;
Drainage tube;
Thoracic trauma
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2022;49(8):538-543,F3
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the relationship between the diameter of drainage used in closed thoracic drainage (CTD) and the prognosis of patients with thoracic trauma.Methods:This study was a retrospective cohort study, a total of 146 patients who were admitted to the 971st Navy Hospital due to thoracic trauma from April 2017 to June 2021 and received closed thoracic drainage were selected as the research subjects. According to the prognosis, they were divided into a good group ( n=96) and a poor group ( n=50), and the clinical efficacy, general data and postoperative complications of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Multivariate Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for poor prognosis, and a nomogram prediction model was established, and the model was evaluated. The relationship between the size of drainage diameter and the prognosis of patients with thoracic trauma was analyzed by Pearson correlation. The normally distributed measurement data was expressed by the ( ± s), and the independent samples t test was used for comparison between groups; The chi-square test was used for comparison of count data between groups. Results:The clinical efficacy of CTD was good, with a total effective probability of 87.67%; and 3 weeks after surgery, the patient′s prognosis was good, with a good prognosis probability of 65.75%. Logistic analysis showed that age 60 years old ( OR=1.501, 95% CI: 1.105-2.177), excipient replacement time of 2-3 d ( OR=2.543, 95% CI: 1.729-3.168), drainage bottle higher than thoracic cavity ( OR=1.692, 95% CI: 1.314-2.482), long wound healing time ( OR=1.971, 95% CI: 1.479-2.720), frequent cough ( OR=2.259, 95% CI: 1.564-2.924), and drainage tube diameter 16 F ( OR=3.087, 95% CI: 2.074-3.793) were independent risk factors for poor prognosis ( P<0.05). The size of drainage diameter was positively correlated with hospitalization and wound healing time, pain VAS score ( P<0.05), and negatively correlated with Barthel Index ( P<0.05). Conclusion:Drainage tube diameter 16 F is one of the independent risk factors for poor prognosis of patients. The smaller the drainage diameter, the shorter the postoperative hospital stay, faster wound healing, lighter pain and stronger ability of life and activity.
