Analysis of influencing factors of therapeutic strategies for spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection
10.3760/cma.j.cn115396-20220223-00057
- VernacularTitle:自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层治疗策略的影响因素分析
- Author:
Lishan LIAN
1
;
Zhe ZHANG
;
Zhiwen ZHANG
;
Hongzhi YU
;
Xueming CHEN
;
Hai FENG
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院血管外科，北京 100050
- Keywords:
Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection;
Vascular remodeling;
Stents;
Patency rate;
Mesenteric artery, superior;
Factor analysis, statis
- From:
International Journal of Surgery
2022;49(6):427-432,F5
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the influencing factors and clinical effect analysis of the choice of treatment method for spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).Methods:The clinical data of 35 patients with SISMAD admitted to Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from December 2015 to November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into conservative group ( n=24) and surgical group (endoluminal stent group + open surgery group, n=11). The conservative group was treated with conservative methods, the endoluminal stent group ( n=10) was treated with endoluminal stent placement, and the open surgery group ( n=1) was treated with superior mesenteric artery endarterectomy + angioplasty + ileal resection. The white blood cell (WBC) count on admission, the time of abdominal pain, YOO classification, aorta mesenteric angle(AMA), and the length of hospital stay between the two groups were analyzed. All patients were followed up for more than 24 months, at the end of which the vascular remodeling rate of superior mesenteric artery (SMA) between the two groups was studied. In addition, the primary patency rate and secondary patency rate of intracavitary stents were analyzed. Measurement data that conform to normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( ± s), and independent samples t-test was used for comparison between groups; measurement data that do not conform to normal distribution were expressed as median (interquartile range) [ M( Q1,Q3)], the nonparametric test was used for comparison between groups. Enumeration data were compared between groups using the Chi-square test. Results:Univariate analysis showed that compared with the conservative group, the IVS type in YOO classificationin of surgical group was significantly more than the conservative group. There was no significant difference in WBC, duration of abdominal pain, or AMA at admission ( P>0.05). In addition, the length of hospital stay in the conservative group was significantly shorter than that in the surgical group. No intestinal necrosis occurred in endoluminal stent group. After 24 months of follow-up, the remodeling rate of SMA in the surgical group was higher than that in the conservative group; the primary patency rate of the endoluminal stent group was 87.5%, and the secondary patency rate was 100%. One patient in the conservative group developed SMA dissection aneurysm during 12 months of follow-up and received endovascular treatment. Conclusions:For the treatment of SISMAD, most patients can be cured by conservative treatment. However, for patients with consistent abdominal pain and IVS type in YOO classification, if there is no severe manifestation of peritonitis, it is recommended to perform endovascular stent placement as soon as possible to open the blood supply. Meanwhile, the SMA stenting has an ideal long-term patency rate and vascular remodeling rate.
