Influence of prior percutaneous coronary intervention on outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting: A multi-center clinical study
- VernacularTitle:经皮冠状动脉介入史对冠状动脉旁路移植术结果影响的多中心临床研究
- Author:
Hongwei JIANG
1
;
Hang ZHANG
1
;
Wen CHEN
1
;
Fangjing ZHENG
1
;
Yongfeng SHAO
2
;
Yongxiang QIAN
3
,
4
;
Guoxiang WANG
5
;
Mingqiu LI
6
,
7
;
Qingsheng YOU
8
;
Zhiyong LIU
9
;
Yong WANG
4
,
10
,
11
;
Zhenya SHEN
12
;
Wei LI
13
;
Demin LI
14
;
Su HUANG
15
,
16
;
Chongjun ZHONG
17
,
18
;
Rui WANG
1
;
Xin CHEN
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Percutaneous coronary intervention; coronary artery bypass grafting; follow-up; clinical outcome; multi-center; clinical study
- From: Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022;29(11):1436-1441
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
- Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Clinical data of 5 216 patients from Jiangsu Province CABG registry who underwent primary isolated CABG from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into a PCI group (n=673) and a non-PCI group (n=4 543) according to whether they had received PCI treatment. The PCI group included 491 males and 182 females, aged 62.6±8.2 years, and the non-PCI group included 3 335 males and 1 208 females, aged 63.7±8.7 years. Multivariable logistic regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to compare 30-day mortality, incidence of major complications and 1-year follow-up outcomes between the two groups. Results Both in original cohort and matched cohort, there was no statistical difference in the 30-day mortality [14 (2.1%) vs. 77 (1.7%), P=0.579; 14 (2.1%) vs. 11 (1.6%), P=0.686], or the incidence of major complications (myocardial infarction, stroke, mechanical ventilation≥24 h, dialysis for new-onset renal failure, deep sternal wound infection and atrial fibrillation) (all P>0.05). The rate of reoperation for bleeding in the PCI group was higher than that in the non-PCI group [19 (2.8%) vs. 67 (1.5%), P=0.016; 19 (2.8%) vs. 7 (1.0%), P=0.029]. Both in original cohort and matched cohort, there was no statistical difference in 1-year survival rate between the two groups [613 (93.1%) vs. 4 225 (94.6%), P=0.119; 613 (93.1%) vs. 630 (95.2%), P=0.124], while the re-admission rate in the PCI group was significantly higher than that in the non-PCI group [32 (4.9%) vs. 113 (2.5%), P=0.001; 32 (4.9%) vs. 17 (2.6%), P=0.040]. Conclusion This study shows that a history of PCI treatment does not significantly increase the perioperative mortality and major complications of CABG, but increases the rate of cardiogenic re-admission 1 year postoperatively.