Internal carotid artery embolization in endoscopic salvage surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20220425-00221
- Author:
Wan Peng LI
1
;
Qiang LIU
2
;
Hao Yuan XU
1
;
Huan WANG
1
;
Huan Kang ZHANG
1
;
Quan LIU
1
;
Xi Cai SUN
1
;
Yu Rong GU
1
;
Hou Yong LI
1
;
Hong Meng YU
1
;
De Hui WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
2. Department of Radiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Male;
Female;
Adult;
Middle Aged;
Aged;
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma;
Salvage Therapy;
Retrospective Studies;
Carotid Artery, Internal;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery*;
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2022;57(11):1294-1303
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of internal carotid artery (ICA) embolization technology in endoscopic salvage surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) invading the ICA. Methods: From January 2016 to March 2021, 83 patients with rNPC who invaded the ICA and underwent endoscopic extended nasopharyngectomy were retrospectively collected from the Eye & ENT Hospital in Fudan University, including 60 males and 23 females. The age of the patients ranged from 27 to 77 years. The standard of ICA invasion was that the distance from the lesion to the ICA on enhanced MRI was ≤ 1.8 mm. The clinical characteristics, ICA management strategy and survival prognosis of patients were analyzed, and the effectiveness of ICA embolization was evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the survival rate and Log-rank test was used to compare the difference. Results: In 83 patients with rNPC, there were 13 patients with rT2, 38 patients with rT3, 32 patients with rT4, and 16 patients had lymph node metastasis. A total of 37 patients (44.6%) underwent ICA coil embolization before surgery, of which 2 cases underwent external carotid-middle cerebral artery artery bypass grafting and ICA embolization due to positive balloon occlusion test (BOT). Patients with positive surgical margin accounted for 24.1% (20/83). Among them, patients with rT4 and patients without ICA embolization had a higher positive rate of surgical margin (P value was 0.001, 0.043, respectively). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rate of all patients was 46.5% and 26.7%, respectively. In addition, the 3-year OS and PFS of patients with ICA embolization was significantly higher than those without ICA embolization, respectively (69.1% vs 27.8%, P=0.003; 33.9% vs 18.9%, P=0.018). Only 2 patients (2/37, 5.4%) had cerebral infarction complications after coil embolization of the affected ICA due to negative BOT. Conclusion: Preoperative ICA embolization can be used to treat patients with rNPC invading the ICA, improve the total removal rate and survival rate of patients, which is an effective salvage treatment.
