A two-stitch continuous suture method for single-lumen ileostomy.
10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220810-00342
- Author:
Qing Nan LAN
1
;
Jin Long YU
1
;
Jie YU
1
;
Gui Zhi LUO
1
;
Qi ZOU
1
;
Zhao Wei ZOU
1
Author Information
1. Department of General Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University,Guangzhou 510220,China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Humans;
Ileostomy/adverse effects*;
Retrospective Studies;
Suture Techniques/adverse effects*;
Surgical Stomas;
Sutures/adverse effects*;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2022;25(11):1020-1024
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the value of a two-stitch continuous suture in single- lumen ileostomy. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Data for 98 patients who underwent single-lumen enterostomy were retrospectively collected between 1 January 2021 and 1 May 2022 at Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University. All patients met the indications for prophylactic single-lumen ileostomy. Those older than 80 years of age, with complex underlying diseases, extremely poor systemic conditions who could not tolerate surgery, poor blood supply at the end of the bowel, and severe edema or severe infection at the end of the bowel were excluded. Among the included patients, patients who underwent surgery before 1 October 2021 underwent ileostomy with interrupted suture (control group, n=60), and patients operated on and after 1 October 2021 routinely underwent two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy (two-stitch stoma group, n=38). Two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy is performed as follows: the first continuous suture is used to suture the intestinal seromuscular layer, peritoneum, posterior sheath, and anterior sheath from deep to superficial layers. The bowel wall is then opened. The second continuous suture is used to suture the full thickness of the bowel and the skin. The differences in postoperative ostomy-related complications and operation time were compared between the groups. Results: There were no significant differences in baseline data between the groups (all, P>0.05). The operative time in the two-stitch stoma group was shorter than that of the control group (16.6±2.2 minutes vs. 25.1±2.4 minutes, respectively; t=-17.874;P<0.001). The incidences of mucocutaneous separation, dermatitis, and stoma rebound in the two-stitch stoma group were lower than those of the control group [5.3% (2/38) vs. 31.7% (19/60), χ2=9.633, P=0.002;5.3% (2/38) vs. 28.3% (17/60), χ2=7.923, P=0.005; and 2.6% (1/38) vs. 18.3% (11/60), P=0.026, respectively], while the incidences of parastomal hernia and stoma prolapse, and the postoperative visual analog scale scores in the two groups were similar (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional single-lumen ileostomy, two-stitch continuous suture ileostomy has the advantages of short operation time, simplicity, esthetic appearance of the stoma, and a significant reduction in the postoperative complications associated with ileostomy.
