Analysis on perioperative safety and feasibility of pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220725-00327
- VernacularTitle:纯单孔腹腔镜胃癌根治术围手术期的安全性及可行性分析
- Author:
Ming De ZANG
1
,
2
;
Jie CHEN
1
,
2
;
Yu ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Yi XUAN
1
,
2
;
Hua HUANG
1
,
2
Author Information
1. Department of Gastric Cancer Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
2. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Feasibility Studies;
Gastrectomy/methods*;
Humans;
Laparoscopy/methods*;
Postoperative Complications/etiology*;
Retrospective Studies;
Stomach Neoplasms/pathology*;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2022;25(8):726-730
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the safety and feasibility of pure single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SDG) in the radical treatment of gastric cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. Subjects were included in the study who were diagnosed by imaging examination and pathology as early distal gastric cancer, no distant metastasis, no serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases and underwent radical gastrectomy. Patients with incomplete clinical data, unplanned second operation and complicated with other tumors were excluded. A retrospective analysis was performed on 15 patients who underwent pure SDG radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from September 2020 to March 2022, namely the SDG group. Fifty-eight patients undergoing conventional five-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were included as the control group, namely the LDG group. As it was found that there was a statistically significant difference in baseline body mass index (BMI) between the two groups [(20.8±0.8) kg/m2 vs. (22.9±0.4) kg/m2, t=2.456, P=0.017], one-to-one PSM was conducted between the two groups. Then the basic conditions of the two groups of patients in perioperative period were analyzed and compared. Results: There were 14 patients after PSM in the SDG group and the LDG group respectively. There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph nodes dissected, time to the first postoperative feeding and postoperative complications between the SDG group and the LDG group (all P>0.05). Compared with LDG group, the operative time in the SDG group was longer [(163.6±6.3) minutes vs. (133.9±4.4) minutes, t=3.866, P=0.001]. However, in the SDG group, time to the first flatus [(2.6±0.2) days vs. (3.3±0.1) days, t=3.053,P=0.005], time to drainage tube removal [(4.5±0.8) days vs. (6.9±0.2) days, t=2.914, P=0.007)] and postoperative hospital stay [(6.7±0.1) days vs. (9.2±1.0) days, t=2.534,P=0.018)] were significantly shorter, and pain score at the first postoperative day evaluated by NRS (1.86±0.29 vs. 2.86±0.35, t=2.205, P=0.037) was significantly lower as compared to the LDG group. Four patients in SDG group did not receive peritoneal drainage tube placement after surgery, and they all recovered safely. Conclusion: The pure single-port laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible, and has an advantage over the LDG in postoperative recovery.
