A preliminary exploration into the efficacy of personalized surgical schemes in the repair of maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20220615-00326
- VernacularTitle:个性化手术修复上颌窦穿孔及上颌窦瘘疗效初探
- Author:
Qing Ying CUI
1
;
Si Yu CHEN
1
;
Shuai FU
1
;
Can Bang PENG
1
;
Wen MA
1
;
Li Dong WANG
1
;
Chang Bin ZHANG
1
;
Ming LI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University & Yunnan Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Kunming 650500, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Fistula/surgery*;
Humans;
Inflammation;
Maxilla;
Maxillary Sinus/surgery*;
Oroantral Fistula/surgery*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2022;57(9):953-957
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To explore the efficacy and value of personalized surgical schemes in the repair of maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula based on the size of the maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula. A total of 28 patients with maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula who were admitted to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatology Hospital of Kunming Medical University from July 2017 to May 2020 were included to conduct a prospective case clinical study. After the inflammation in the maxillary sinus was controlled, a proper surgical repair method was selected according to the size of the perforation and fistula based on the double-layer closure technique. The diameter of the perforation and fistula was measured with the assistance of cone-beam CT. After that, the platelet rich fibrin (PRF) repair was performed on the perforation and fistula with 3 mm≤diameter<7 mm in size in 14 patients. The PRF repair and buccal flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with 7 mm ≤diameter<15 mm in size in 7 patients. The adjacent buccal pad repair, palatine flap repair, and buccal flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with 15 mm≤ diameter<25 mm in size in 4 patients. The nasolabial axial flap repair and nasolabial free flap repair were performed on the perforation and fistula with a diameter ≥25 mm in size in 3 patients. The medical follow-up was conducted in all patients in the 1st, 2nd, and 4th week after surgery, with an overall success rate reaching 96.4% (27/28) after the initial intervention. The relapse of disease occurred in one patient (4.6%) with diabetes and a smoking history in the 2nd week after surgery. Identifying a proper surgical repair method according to the size of the oral and maxillary sinus perforation and maxillary sinus fistula based on the double-layer closure technique can improve the one-time cure rate in these patients under the premise that the inflammation in the maxillary sinus can be controlled.
