Effects of biological amnion membrane coverage combined with corneal bandage lens on chemical burns of ocular surface
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2023.1.33
- VernacularTitle:生物羊膜覆盖联合角膜绷带镜治疗眼表化学性烧伤
- Author:
Peng-Fei TIAN
1
;
Kun HE
1
;
Shou-Hui ZHU
1
;
Min ZHANG
1
;
Guo-Ning YE
1
;
Bing-Xin PAN
1
Author Information
1. Ophthalmic Center, Zhejiang Medical and Health Group Quzhou Hospital(Zhejiang Quhua Hospital), Quzhou 324000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
chemical burns of ocular surface;
biological amniotic membrane;
corneal bandage lens
- From:
International Eye Science
2023;23(1):167-171
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
AIM: To investigate the clinical effect and stability of biological amnion membrane coverage combined with corneal bandage lens for patients with chemical burns of ocular surface.METHODS: Retrospective study. The clinical data of 49 cases(49 eyes)of patients with chemical burns of ocular surface treated in our hospital between December 2018 and August 2021 were collected. They were divided into the biological amnion membrane coverage group and the biological amnion membrane coverage combined with corneal bandage lens group according to the surgical method. The loss time of biological amniotic membrane, postoperative pain score, repair rate and time of ocular surface, visual acuity and complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: The ocular pain scores of the two groups were 2.208±0.758(the biological amnion membrane coverage group)and 2.063±0.800(the biological amnion membrane coverage combined with corneal bandage lens group)at 1d after surgery, respectively(P>0.05). But at the 3d and 7d after surgery, pain scores were 1.844±0.762 and 1.150±0.582, 1.684±0.820 and 0.750±0.514, respectively(all P<0.05). The loss time of biological amniotic membrane in the biological amnion membrane coverage combined with corneal bandage lens group was 10.75±2.63d, which was longer than that in the biological amnion membrane coverage group(7.60±2.22d; P<0.05). Moreover, it has better ocular surface repair effect than the biological amnion membrane coverage group. At 6mo after operation, visual acuity in the two groups was 0.30(0.10, 0.55)and 0.30(0.20, 0.58), respectively(P>0.05). Additionally, there was no differences in the complications of both groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION:Biological amnion membrane coverage has effective treatment effects on patients with chemical burns of ocular surface, and it can delay the loss time of biological amniotic membrane, increase repair rate of ocular surface and alleviate postoperative discomfort if combined with corneal bandage lens.
