Visual Electrophysiological Diagnosis and Treatment Technology for Early Intervention of Urinary Incontinence After TUERP
10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ（med.sci）.2022.0602
- VernacularTitle:可视化电生理诊断与治疗技术早期干预前列腺剜除术后尿失禁
- Author:
Dao-sheng LUO
1
;
Jian-jun LU
1
;
Wei-ning LIANG
1
;
Yan-chuan ZOU
1
;
Jun-hua MO
1
;
Shu-er CHEN
1
;
Chun-hua DENG
2
Author Information
1. Department of Urology， Affiliated Dongguan Hospital， Southern Medical University//Dongguan People’s Hospital， Dongguan 523059， China
2. Department of Urology and Andrology， The First Affiliated Hospital， Sun Yat-sen University， Guangzhou 510080， China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
benign prostatic hyperplasia;
transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate;
urinary incontinence;
electrophysiology
- From:
Journal of Sun Yat-sen University(Medical Sciences)
2022;43(6):878-883
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo summarize the effect of visual electrophysiological diagnosis and treatment technology on postoperative urinary incontinence in early intervention after transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate （TUERP）. MethodsTotally 86 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） who underwent TUERP in the Puji Branch Hospital of Dongguan People's Hospital from December 2020 to June 2022 were selected as the treatment group， who received electrophysiological treatment after postoperative removal of the catheter on the 6th day after surgery， while 79 cases who received no electrophysiological treatment after surgery were selected as the control group. The urinary incontinence rates of the two groups on the 6th day， at 1 month and 3 months after surgery were observed. ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups in the preoperative basic data. The rates of urinary incontinence after removal of the catheter in the two groups on the 6th day after surgery were 13 cases （15.1%） in the treatment group and 12 cases （15.2%） in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups （P >0.05）， and the overall postoperative urinary incontinence rate in the two groups was 15.2% （25/165）. At one month after surgery， only 4 cases （4.65%） had slight urinary incontinence in the treatment group， while 13 cases （16.5%） in the control group still had urinary incontinence， and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （ P=0.019）. After follow-up to three months after operation， there was no case of urinary incontinence in the treatment group， and there were still 7 cases （8.86%） of urinary incontinence in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P=0.005）. ConclusionThe early intervention of visual electrophysiological diagnosis and treatment technology can effectively prevent the occurrence of urinary incontinence after TUERP， and has good value in clinical application.
