Efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left ventricular thrombus：a meta-analysis
- VernacularTitle:新型口服抗凝药对比华法林用于左心室血栓有效性和安全性的Meta分析
- Author:
Qiang ZHOU
1
;
Yueyue ZANG
2
;
Yingying TAO
1
;
Xiaohui HUANG
1
;
Yanzi WU
1
;
Yuansu YANG
3
;
Meng WEI
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy，General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command of PLA，Nanjing 210002，China
2. School of Pharmacy，Nanjing Medical University，Nanjing 210029，China
3. Research Training Division，General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command of PLA，Nanjing 210002，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
left ventricular thrombus;
warfarin;
new oral anticoagulants;
efficacy;
safety
- From:
China Pharmacy
2022;33(24):3034-3039
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants （NOACs） and warfarin in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus （LVT）， and to provide evidenced-based reference for rational drug use in clinic. METHODS Retrieved from PubMed， Cochrane Library， Embase， Ovid Medline， CNKI， Wanfang and VIP during the inceptions to March 2022， after screening the literature and extracting data， the quality of randomized controlled trials （RCTs） was evaluated by using bias risk evaluation tool recommended by Cochrane systematic evaluator manual. Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of cohort studies， and RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis and bias risk analysis. RESULTS A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis， including 2 RCTs， 11 cohort studies and 2 261 patients； results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the incidence of complete LVT resolution [OR＝1.05， 95%CI（0.81，1.37）， P＝0.71]， the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism [OR＝0.89， 95%CI（0.67，1.18）， P＝0.42]， the incidence of massive haemorrhage [OR＝ 0.61， 95%CI（0.19，1.97）， P＝0.41]， the incidence of rehospitalization [OR＝0.84， 95%CI（0.49，1.46）， P＝0.54] or all-cause mortality [OR＝0.93， 95%CI（0.56，1.56）， P＝0.79] between 2 groups. The incidence of any bleeding event in trial group was significantly lower than that control group[OR＝ 025-80863493。0.65， 95%CI（0.45，0.93）， P＝0.02]. Subgroup analysis showed that complete LVT resolution of patients with follow-up ≤6 months in trial group was significantly higher than control group， and the incidence of any bleeding event was significantly lower in patients with follow-up ＞6 months and in the European region than control group （P＜0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complete LVT resolution in patients with follow-up＞6 months， the incidence of any bleeding event in patients from Asia and America， or the incidence of any bleeding event in the two groups included in the RCT or the cohort study （P＞0.05）. The publication bias analysis showed that publication bias was less likely in the rate of complete LVT resolution but more likely in the incidence of any bleeding event. CONCLUSIONS NOACs can eliminate thrombus faster in the early stage， but with the prolongation of anticoagulation time， the efficacy of NOACs is comparable to warfarin， and the safety of NOACs in any bleeding event is better than warfarin.
