Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.
- Author:
Damian KAWECKI
1
;
Beata MORAWIEC
;
Marcin FUDAL
;
Wojciech MILEJSKI
;
Wojciech JACHEC
;
Ewa NOWALANY-KOZIELSKA
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article ; Comparative Study
- Keywords: Left main; PCI; DES; CABG
- MeSH: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/*mortality; Cohort Studies; Coronary Artery Bypass/*mortality; *Coronary Artery Disease/mortality/surgery/therapy; Coronary Vessels; *Drug-Eluting Stents; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
- From:Yonsei Medical Journal 2012;53(1):58-67
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the optimal treatment option for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). However, LMCAD remains a constant topic of discussion between cardiac surgeons and interventional cardiologists. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of LMCAD treatments by comparing the mid-term outcomes of CABG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using bare metal stents or drug-eluting stents (DESs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population was comprised of 199 consecutive patients admitted with unprotected LMCAD. All of the patients were assigned to PCI (88 patients) or CABG (111 patients). The primary clinical end point indicated death, stroke of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RESULTS: Patients assigned to PCI were at higher operative risk than patients scheduled for CABG (6.49+/-4.09 vs. 4.81+/-2.67, p=0.0032). Comparison of the group that received DESs with the CABG group did not reveal any differences in major adverse cardio-cerebral events (MACCE) occurrence (21% vs. 16%, p=NS). Patients in the CABG and PCI groups died with similar frequency (11% vs. 16%, p=NS). The mortality rate in the CABG group was higher than among those treated with DES (11% vs. 3%, p=0.049). The rate of ACS was higher in the PCI group than in the CABG group (13% vs. 4%, p=0.016). CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that patients treated with PCI were at higher operative risk, PCI with DES was shown to be comparable to CABG in terms of mortality, stroke and ACS. However, the frequency of repeat revascularizations remains a constant concern with PCI.
