Comprehensive meta-analysis of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement versus plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty for preventing periprosthetic joint infection.
10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.001
- Author:
Ting XU
1
;
Ke-Liang WU
2
;
Ke JIE
3
Author Information
1. Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong Province, China.
2. Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong Province, China.
3. Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong Province, China. Electronic address: 327612303@qq.com.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Antibiotic-loaded cement;
Meta;
Periprosthetic joint infection;
Plain bone cement;
Primary total knee arthroplasty;
Surgical site infection
- MeSH:
Humans;
Bone Cements;
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods*;
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*;
Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology*;
Retrospective Studies;
Arthritis, Infectious/etiology*;
Gentamicins;
Surgical Wound Infection/drug therapy*
- From:
Chinese Journal of Traumatology
2022;25(6):325-330
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE:Antibiotic-loaded bone cement (ALBC) was usually used to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in primary total knee arthroplasty (PTKA), but whether to use ALBC or plain bone cement in PTKA remains unclear. We aimed to compare the occurrence rate of PJI using two different cements, and to investigate the efficacy of different antibiotic types and doses administered in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) with ALBC.
METHODS:The availability of ALBC for preventing PJI was evaluated by using a systematic review and meta-analysis referring to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Existing articles until December 2021 involving PTKA patients with both ALBC and plain bone cement cohorts were scanned by searching "total knee arthroplasty", "antibiotic-loaded cement", "antibiotic prophylaxis", "antibiotic-impregnated cement" and "antibiotic-laden cement" in the database of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Subgroup analysis included the effectiveness of different antibiotic types and doses in preventing SSI with ALBC. The modified Jadad scale was employed to score the qualities of included articles.
RESULTS:Eleven quantitative studies were enrolled, including 34,159 knees undergoing PTKA. The meta-analysis results demonstrated that the use of prophylactic ALBC could significantly reduce the prevalence of deep incisional SSI after PTKA, whereas there was no significant reduction in the rate of superficial incisional SSI. Moreover, gentamicin-loaded cement was effective in preventing deep incisional SSI, and the use of high-dose ALBC significantly reduced the rate of deep incisional SSI after PTKA. Besides, no significant adverse reactions and complications were stated during the use of ALBC in PTKA.
CONCLUSION:The preventive application of ALBC during PTKA could reduce the rates of deep PJI. Furthermore, bone cement containing gentamicin and high-dose ALBC could even better prevent deep infection after PTKA. However, the existing related articles are mostly single-center and retrospective studies, and further high-quality ones are needed for confirmation.
