Minimally invasive osteotomy with absorbable screws in treating hallux valgus deformity.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.09.007
- Author:
Qin-Meng YANG
1
;
Xiao-Yong FU
1
;
Guo-Jie LIN
1
;
Jin-Song HONG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Guangzhou Orthopaedic Hospital, Guangdong 510045, Guangzhou, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Absorbable implants;
Hallux valgus;
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Aged;
Bunion;
Female;
Hallux Valgus/surgery*;
Humans;
Hypesthesia;
Male;
Metatarsal Bones/surgery*;
Middle Aged;
Osteotomy/methods*;
Radiography;
Retrospective Studies;
Titanium;
Young Adult
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2022;35(9):836-842
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate clnical effect of minimally invasive osteotomy with absorbable screws in treating hallux valgus deformity.
METHODS:Clnical data of 31 patients with hallux valgus deformity were retrospective analyzed from January 2019 to December 2020, and divided into absorbable screws group (17 patients) and titanium cannulated screw group (14 patients). In absorbable screws group, there were 1 male and 16 females aged from 32 to 72 years old with an average of (54.53±12.12) years old;6 patients on the left side, 5 on bilateral and 6 on the right side;1 patient was mild, 11 moderate and 5 severe;treated with minimally invasive osteotomy and fixation of absorbable screws. In titanium cannulated screw group, there were 2 males and 12 females aged from 18 to 71 years old with an average of (47.57±15.68) years old;4 patients on the left side, 4 on bilateral and 6 on the right side;1 patient was mild, 9 moderate and 4severe;treated with minimally invasive osteotomy and fixation of titanium cannulated screw. Complications between two groups were observed, changes of hallux valgus angle (HVA)and intermetatarsal angle (IMA)were detected and compared before and after operation at 12 months, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) and visual analogue scale(VAS) before and after operation at 12 months were also compared.
RESULTS:All 31 patients were followed up from 13 to 20 months with an average of (16.61±2.47) months. Patients in absorbable screws group were followed up from 14 to 20 months with an average of (16.88±2.80) months, while patients in titanium cannulated screw group were followed up from 13 to 19 months with an average of (16.29±2.05) months;there was no difference between two groups(P>0.05). One patient in absorbable screws group occurred numbness around incision, 3 patients in titanium cannulated screw group occurred complications, including numbness around incision in 1 patient, skin irritation due to internal fixation in 1 patient, and recurrence in 1 case;there was no statistic difference between two groups (χ2=1.651, P=0.199). There were no statistic difference in HVA and IMA between two groups before and after operation at 12 months(P>0.05). There were no statistic difference between two groups in AOFAS and VAS before and after operation at 12 months(P>0.05).
CONCLUSION:Compare with mainstream fixation with titanium hollow screw after minmally invasive osteotomy, fixation with absorbable screw could achieve comparable clinical outcome on the basis of images and function evaluation.
