Actual situation and prescribing patterns of opioids by pain physicians in South Korea
10.3344/kjp.2022.35.4.475
- Author:
Min Jung KIM
1
;
Ji Yeon KIM
;
Yun Hee LIM
;
Sung Jun HONG
;
Jae Hun JEONG
;
Hey Ran CHOI
;
Sun Kyung PARK
;
Jung Eun KIM
;
Min Ki LEE
;
Jae Hun KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Publication Type:Clinical Research Article
- From:The Korean Journal of Pain
2022;35(4):475-487
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:Use of opioids for chronic intractable pain is increasing globally, and their proper use can improve patients’ quality of life. In contrast, opioid use disorders, such as abuse or addiction, caused by prescribing opioids, are a worldwide issue. This study aimed to understand current opioid prescribing patterns and pain physicians’ experiences with opioid use in South Korea.
Methods:Pain physicians in 42 university hospitals in South Korea were asked to complete anonymous questionnaires regarding opioid prescriptions.
Results:A total of 69 surveys were completed. Most pain physicians started prescribing opioids at a pain score of 7/10 and aimed to reduce pain by 50%. Most physicians (73.1%) actively explained the prescribed medications and possible side effects, and 61.2% of physicians preferred the prescription interval of 4 weeks.Immediate-release opioids were the most popular treatment for breakthrough pain (92.6%). The most common side effect encountered by physicians was constipation (43.3%), followed by nausea/vomiting (34.3%). Of the physicians, 56.5% replied that addiction and misuse prevalences were less than 5%. However, the most concerning side effect was addiction (33.0%).
Conclusions:The survey results showed that the prescribing patterns of pain physicians generally followed Korean guidelines. Physicians were most interested in the safety and effectiveness of opioid prescriptions. They were most concerned about respiratory depression and abuse or addiction. A significant number of physicians agreed that the NHIS regulations needed improvement for patient convenience and safe and effective treatment, though there were pros and cons of the NHIS restrictions on prescription conditions.
