Usefulness of lateral cephalometric radiography for successful blind nasal intubation: a prospective study
10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.6.427
- Author:
Kana ITO
1
;
Ayaka KAMURA
;
Kyotaro KOSHIKA
;
Toshiyuki HANDA
;
Nobuyuki MATSUURA
;
Tatsuya ICHINOHE
Author Information
1. Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan
- Publication Type:Original Article
- From:Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
2022;22(6):427-435
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:This study aimed to investigate the relationship between pharyngeal morphology and the success or failure of blind nasotracheal intubation using standard lateral cephalometric radiography and to analyze the measurement items affecting the difficulty of blind nasotracheal intubation.
Methods:Assuming a line perpendicular to the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane, the reference point (O) was selected 1 cm above the posterior-most end of the hard palate. A line passing through the reference point and parallel to the FH plane is defined as the X-axis, and a line passing through the reference point and perpendicular to the X-axis is defined as the Y-axis. The shortest length between the tip of the uvula and posterior pharyngeal wall (AW), shortest length between the base of the tongue and posterior pharyngeal wall (BW), and width of the glottis (CW) were measured. The midpoints of the lines representing each width are defined as points A, B, and C, and the X and Y coordinates of each point are obtained (AX, BX, CX, AY, BY, and CY). For each measurement, a t-test was performed to compare the tracheal intubation success and failure groups. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed using clinically relevant items.
Results:The items significantly affecting the success rate of blind nasotracheal intubation included the difference in X coordinates at points A and C (Odds ratio, 0.714; P-value, 0.024) and the ∠ABC (Odds ratio, 1.178;P-value, 0.016).
Conclusion:Using binomial logistic regression analysis, we observed statistically significant differences in AX-CX and ∠ABC between the success group and the failure group.
