Analysis of Manuscripts Rejected by the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration 2012~2015 Jun.
10.11111/jkana.2015.21.5.561
- Author:
Seok Hee JEONG
1
;
Taewha LEE
;
Soyoung YU
;
Myoung Hee SEO
Author Information
1. College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Chonbuk National University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Nursing research;
Manuscripts as topic;
Peer review;
Research;
Rejection
- MeSH:
Evaluation Studies as Topic;
Financial Management;
Manuscripts as Topic;
Nursing Administration Research;
Nursing Research;
Nursing*;
Occupations;
Peer Review;
Publications;
Qualitative Research
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration
2015;21(5):561-574
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analysis the manuscripts rejected for publication in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration during the last three years six months (2012~2015 Jun). METHODS: Seventy eight rejected manuscripts were analyzed focusing on manuscripts characteristics, such as rejection rates, year of submission, occupation of first author and corresponding author, number of authors, funding, thesis or dissertation, article type, study participants, number of reviews prior to rejection, and 3rd reviewer. Also reviewers' quantitative evaluation scores and subjective comments were analyzed. Reviewers' subjective comments were analyzed using content analysis methodology. RESULTS: The mean rate for manuscript rejection was 28.9% and for quantitative research, qualitative research, and review papers the quantitative evaluation scores were 2.54+/-0.70, 2.39+/-0.69, and 2.39+/-0.69 out of 5 points, respectively. The most frequent subjective comment on rejected manuscripts was 'lack of rationale for research need'. CONCLUSION: In this study the characteristics and the reasons for rejecting manuscripts were identified. These findings can be used in developing effective strategies for researchers, reviewers and editors to improve the quality of research and research reviews of nursing administration research.
