Review of Reliability and Validity of Medical Service Experience Survey:Focused on the Differences by Type of Medical Institutions
10.4332/KJHPA.2022.32.1.94
- Author:
Heenyun KIM
1
;
Yongseok CHOI
;
Seokjun MOON
;
Jeongwoo SHIN
Author Information
1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Sejong, Korea
- Publication Type:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
- From:Health Policy and Management
2022;32(1):94-106
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The efforts to build more “people centered,” “patient centered” health system has been emerging all over the world. Aligning with it, the Korean government is conducing the survey called “Medical Service Experience Survey (MSES).” There are critics, however, that MSES is not scrutinizing the medical experiences of patients in various healthcare settings. For this reason, this study aims to perform an empirical analysis of the differences in answers of patients responding to various healthcare settings.
Methods:There are two steps in this study. First, explanatory analysis is conducted to compare the tendency of statistical concentration on questionnaires by divided healthcare settings. Second, confirmative analysis is carried out to evaluate the construct validity, reliability, and discriminant validity of the questionnaire in each healthcare setting. The raw data of MSES, which was conducted in 2020 by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Korea and the Korean Institute for Health and Social Affairs is used.
Results:As a result of exploratory factor analysis for all outpatients, the items were classified into four factors statistically: “doctor experience,” “nurse experience,” “outpatient service experience,” and “patient satisfaction.” It was confirmed that the reliability of all factors extracted was secured. However, for patients who visited hospitals, questionnaires related to personal privacy, such as “experiences on medical staffs considering physical exposure” or “experiences related to personal information exposure,” were answered in conjunction with items of “nurse experience.” Besides, patients responded that administrative elements of medical services, such as “experiences of comfort in medical institutions” and “experiences of satisfactory administrative services,” were related to the items of “nurse experience.” The answers of patients who visited traditional medical hospitals and clinics about “doctor experience” and “nurse experience” were not discerned statistically, and the answers to “doctor experience,” “nurse experience,” and “medical institution experience” were entangled with the responses of patients who visited dental hospitals and clinics. On the other hand, as a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, it was found that the inquiries of MSES generally had intensive validity.
Conclusion:The collection of objective and scientific data is the prominent component to enlighten the patient-centered healthcare system alongside with change of the worldwide paradigm of measuring the healthcare system performance as follows the transition of perspective of health care from provider-centered to patient-centered. This study empirically shows that the patient experience can vary as the healthcare settings. Furthermore, to make an advance in measuring the experience of patients with medical services, this article proposes the deliberate consideration of the different kinds of healthcare settings and articulate design of the survey.
