Case Report of Transparotid Approach of Mandibular Subcondylar Fracture.
- Author:
Mincheol MOON
1
;
Suk Joon OH
;
Seoung Hoon KOH
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea. sjoh@hallym.or.kr
- Publication Type:Case Report
- Keywords:
Mandibular subcondylar fracture;
Transparotid approach;
Open reduction
- MeSH:
Accidents, Traffic;
Adult;
Cicatrix;
Facial Bones;
Facial Nerve;
Facial Nerve Injuries;
Fistula;
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Imidazoles;
Mandibular Fractures;
Midazolam;
Mouth;
Nitro Compounds;
Parotid Gland;
Titanium
- From:Journal of the Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
2009;10(1):33-36
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Fractures of the mandibular condylar area are common injuries that account for 29% to 40% of fractures of the facial bones and represent 20% to 62% of all mandibular fractures. Currently 3 main methods are being used in the treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: closed reduction; open reduction and internal fixation; Endoscopic reduction and internal fixation. Each method has its proponents and opponent as well as advantages and disadvantages, and indications for each vary among surgeons. There are six approaches of open reduction: submandibular, retromandibular, preaurilcular, postauricular, intraoral, transparotid approach. Among them, transparotid approach has been described for subcondylar exposure with dissection in the direction of facial nerve fibers to expose the bone through the parotid gland. This approach carries the risk of a parotid glandular fistula as well as facial nerve injury but has the advantage of being directly over the fracture site. We report safety and efficacy of surgical treatment using a transparotid approach for direct plating. METHODS: A 43-year-old man sustained multiple facial bone fractures by driver traffic accident. Mandibular subcondyle was fractured and dislocated internally. We performed open reduction and internal fixation by transparotid approach. Fractured site was fixed by titanium mini plate & screw. We applicated arch bar for approximately 3 weeks. RESULTS: Follow-up length was about 5months. Scar of surgical incision was indistinct, there was no symptoms and signs of facial nerve and parotid gland injury, and maximal mouth opening was measured 49.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Transparotid approach has high risks of facial nerve and parotid gland injury, but paradoxically it is the most effective technique in saving facial nerve. Open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fracture by transparotid approach with precise and versed procedure, best outcome can be expected.
