Comparison of clinical efficacy between Clamshell incision and bilateral posterolateral incision for double lung transplantation
10.3969/j.issn.1674-7445.2022.06.012
- VernacularTitle:Clamshell切口和双侧后外侧切口开胸行双肺移植的临床效果比较
- Author:
Yuan CHEN
1
;
Dian XIONG
;
Jian XU
;
Hongfei CAI
;
Shugao YE
;
Jingyu CHEN
Author Information
1. Wuxi People's Hospital Affliated to Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Wuxi 214023, China
- Publication Type:Research Article
- Keywords:
Sequential double lung transplantation;
Clamshell incision;
Bilateral posterolateral incision;
End-stage lung disease;
Cold ischemia time;
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation;
Clinical efficacy;
Operation mode
- From:
Organ Transplantation
2022;13(6):770-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy between Clamshell incision and bilateral posterolateral incision in the sequential double lung transplantation for end-stage lung disease. Methods Clinical data of 120 recipients undergoing double lung transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. All recipients were divided into bilateral posterolateral incision group (n=108) and Clamshell incision group (n=12) according to different surgical methods. Intraoperative parameters were collected and statistically compared between two groups, including operation time, amount of blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or not, cold ischemia time on the first side, and cold ischemia time on the second side. Postoperative parameters were also compared between two groups, including the length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, tracheal intubation duration, ECMO duration, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), incidence of anastomotic stenosis, incidence of bronchopleural fistula, perioperative fatality, and 6-minute walk test for the first time after operation. Results In the Clamshell incision group, the amount of blood loss and blood transfusion was significantly higher than those in the bilateral posterolateral incision group (both P < 0.05). The proportion of ECMO and cold ischemia time on the second side in the Clamshell incision group were significantly lower or shorter than those in the bilateral posterolateral incision group (both P < 0.05). In the Clamshell incision group, the tracheal intubation duration and ECMO duration were significantly shorter compared with those in bilateral posterolateral incision group (both P < 0.05). Conclusions Both Clamshell incision and bilateral posterolateral incision are safe and effective in sequential double lung transplantation. Bilateral posterolateral incision approach can significantly reduce the amount of blood loss and blood transfusion of the recipients without significantly prolonging the operation time. Compared with bilateral posterolateral incision approach, the cold ischemia time of lung graft, tracheal intubation duration and ECMO duration are significantly shortened via the Clamshell incision.
