Application and Analysis of High-quality Evaluation for Jianwei Xiaoshi Tablets
10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20220159
- VernacularTitle:健胃消食片的优质评价应用分析
- Author:
Anyi ZHAO
1
;
Lukun XIAO
1
;
Sha CHEN
1
;
Cong GUO
1
;
Yuzhen LIU
2
;
Zhiguang WANG
2
;
Yan LIU
1
;
An LIU
1
Author Information
1. Institute of Chinese Materia Medica，China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences，Beijing 100700，China
2. Medical and Pharmaceutical Commercial Association， All-China Federation of Industry and Commerce，Beijing 100101，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Chinese patent medicines;
one product with many manufacturers;
high-quality evaluation;
Jianwei Xiaoshi tablets;
production cycle;
consistency evaluation;
high performance liquid chromatography （HPLC）
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae
2022;28(21):138-146
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Jianwei Xiaoshi tablets， as a common variety of Chinese patent medicine with "one product with many manufacturers"， have many manufacturers and huge market sales. However， the phenomenon about uneven quality and discrepant price is prominent. Based on this， this study was carried out for the quality evaluation of Jianwei Xiaoshi tablets by applying the high-quality evaluation criteria with the quality as core for Chinese patent medicine， which was based on the full production cycle， from the multi-dimension including raw material selection， production process， quality control， post-marketing research and so on. The evaluation results showed that the quality evaluation scores of Jianwei Xiaoshi tablets from different manufacturers varied greatly （ranging from 35 to 66）， indicating that the quality was significantly different. In the actual production， generally inadequate attention was paid to the quality of raw materials， and the quality of raw materials was insufficient with the score ratio of 43%， especially the poor consistency control of them. The role of good manufacturing practice was obvious， and the scores of production process were generally high with the average score ratio of 62%， and the maximum up to 80%. The technological advancement of the manufacturer was outstanding. The score ratio of quality control was only 31% that the internal quality standard of each manufacture almost stayed at the qualified line， which was equal to the national standard， and the consistency of products was insufficient. The post-marketing research was lacking with the score ratio of 37%. Manufacturers with high brand awareness and market share were upper scores， while the others lagged far behind. The results of this evaluation are in line with the overall prediction， which can provide a reference for the high-quality evaluation of Chinese patent medicine， and supply the scientific data for high-quality and high-price application.
