Controversy and prospect of transanal total mesorectal excision.
10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200929-00545
- Author:
Liang LI
1
;
Fei LONG
1
;
Chang Wei LIN
1
;
Min MA
1
;
Gui HU
1
;
Yi ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Rectal neoplasms;
Total mesorectal excision, transanal
- MeSH:
Humans;
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local;
Proctectomy;
Rectal Neoplasms/surgery*;
Rectum/surgery*;
Transanal Endoscopic Surgery
- From:
Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
2021;24(8):727-734
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
As a novel surgical technique, taTME has developed rapidly in recent years. TaTME inevitably attracts some skepticism on safety, efficacy, and indication. First, the controversies over taTME are mainly reflected on the safety and effectiveness of taTME. On one hand, the increase of surgical complications, such as urethral injury, CO2 embolism, anastomotic leakage and pelvic infection, has raised concerns about the safety of taTME. Second, the poor quality of taTME specimens, the increased local recurrence rate and the impaired anal function after taTME, also make people question the effectiveness of taTME. Third, there are more or less controversies in the selection of taTME cases, surgical procedures and cost-effectiveness. However, it can not be denied that taTME has a promising future in view of both surgical theory and clinical practice. Furthermore, taTME is a relatively safe and effective supplementary surgical procedure, especially for patients with low rectal cancer. We should attach more importance to structured training for beginners and conduct high-quality clinical studies in the future development of taTME in China, so as to ensure the safe implementation of taTME and obtain high-level evidence-based medicine evidence, and then standardize the clinical practice of taTME.
