Effect of electrode array type and insertion technique on the insertion force: in vitro cochlear model study.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200831-00712
- VernacularTitle:植入技术与电极特性对人工耳蜗植入力学特征影响的模型研究
- Author:
Jin Xi PAN
1
;
Huan JIA
1
;
Hao Yue TAN
1
;
Xiang ZHOU
1
;
Hao WU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200125, China Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai 200125, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Cochlea/surgery*;
Cochlear Implantation;
Cochlear Implants;
Electrodes, Implanted;
Humans;
Robotics
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2021;56(7):691-697
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To investigate the effect of insertion technique and electrode array type on the insertion force of electrode array, and to provide a basis for further optimizing electrode design and facilitating mini-invasive electrode insertion. Methods: Three types of electrode array from Nurotron (Standard Electrode, Slim-medium Electrode, Slim-long Electrode) were studied. from July 2019 to December 2019. These electrode arrays were inserted into the phantom models of the cochlea, manually or robot-assisted(medium speed and low speed). The real-time force during electrode array insertion was recorded by ATI Nano 17 Ti sensors and was analyzed by accessory software. Origin 2020b software was used for statistical processing. Results: The insertion force of all electrode arrays progressively increased with the insertion depth. With the manual technique, the peak force of slim-medium electrode insertion was significantly smaller than that of the standard electrode insertion((71.0±16.6) mN vs (140.9±52.7) mN, Z=3.683, P<0.01), and the peak force of the slim-long electrode insertion was between the peak force of standard electrode and slim-medium electrode(P>0.05). No difference was found in the force variation of insertion among the three electrodes(P>0.05). With medium-speed and low-speed robotic assistance, the peak force characteristics of three electrodes were similar to those with the manual technique, but the force variation of standard electrode insertion ((83.9±9.7) mN/s) at medium speed was significantly larger than that of the slim-long electrode insertion ((69.2±4.0)mN/s), and the force variation of the standard electrode insertion at low speed was significantly greater than the other two electrodes. For the same electrode, robot-assisted insertion presented significantly lower peak force and force variation than manual insertion for each type of electrode array. But there was no difference in the peak force and force variation between two-speed levels of robot assistance (P>0.05). Conclusions: The insertion force of the electrode array will be lower when a slim electrode array or robot technique is applied. Long electrode array might make manual insertion difficult or less precise. Robot assistance has advantage on force control during electrode array insertion.
