Treatment effect of hemifacial dysplasia by injecting transplantation of autologous tissue in the second stage surgery for total auricle reconstruction.
10.3760/cma.j.cn115330-20200906-00723
- VernacularTitle:全耳廓再造二期立耳术中自体组织注射移植治疗半侧颜面短小畸形的疗效研究
- Author:
Dong Yi ZHANG
1
;
Lu Lu ZHANG
1
;
Zhi Peng WANG
1
;
Ying Wei XU
1
;
Qing Liang LIU
1
;
Shang Hua ZHAO
1
;
Shen Song KANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Plastic Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Henan University, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Adult;
Child;
Congenital Microtia/surgery*;
Ear Auricle/surgery*;
Ear, External/surgery*;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Operative Time;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures;
Treatment Outcome;
Young Adult
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2021;56(6):643-647
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To observe the treatment effect of hemifacial dysplasia by injecting transplantation of autologous dermis and fat granules in the second stage surgery for total auricle reconstruction. Methods: From March 2013 to March 2018, 57 patients with unilateral microtia and mild-to-moderate hemifacial dysplasia were divided into concurrent treatment group (32 cases, including 13 females and 19 males and aged 6-33 years old with an average age of 12.5 years) and traditional treatment group (25 cases, including 10 females and 15 males and aged 6-21 years old with an average age of 11.3 years) according to the different surgical methods. Modified Nagata method of auricular reconstruction was chosen, in the second stage surgery (cranial ear angle plasty), patients in concurrent treatment group received the treatment of hemifacial dysplasia with autologous dermal and fat injection transplantation at the same time; Patients in traditional treatment group only received cranial ear angle plasty. Statistical analysis of the two groups of patients was carried out for the average operation time, the average length of hospital stay, the incidence of common complications and postoperative satisfaction rate. SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The mean operation time of the concurrent treatment group (282.0±3.4)min was longer than that of the traditional treatment group (243.0±3.1)min, and the difference was statistically significant (t=9.884, P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the average length of stay between the the concurrent treatment group (9.4±0.3)d and the traditional treatment group(9.5±0.2)d, t=0.256, P>0.05. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of common surgical complications between the concurrent treatment group (12.5%, 4/32) and the traditional treatment group(12.0%, 3/25), χ2=0, P>0.05. Postoperative satisfaction rate of the concurrent treatment group(90.6%, 29/32) was significantly higher than that of the traditional treatment group(56.0%, 14/25), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=9.081, P<0.05). Conclusions: Auricular reconstruction with treatment of hemifacial dysplasia should not significantly increase the average length of stay and the incidence of common complications compared with auricular reconstruction alone. Although the operation time is slightly extended, the scheme of concurrent treatment can reduce the times of operations, save medical resources and increase the satisfaction rate of patients.
