Quantitative evaluation of image quality of megavoltage computed tomography for guiding helical tomotherapy.
10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2019.03.022
- Author:
Yu Liang HUANG
1
;
Chen Guang LI
1
;
Kai MAO
2
;
Jian An WU
2
;
Tian Tian DAI
2
;
Yuan Yuan HAN
2
;
Hao WU
1
;
Hai Yang WANG
1
;
Yi Bao ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Beijing 100142, China.
2. Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Center of Respiratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing 100029, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Phantoms, Imaging;
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated;
Tomography, Spiral Computed;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:
Journal of Peking University(Health Sciences)
2019;51(3):525-529
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To quantitatively analyze image quality of two sets of phantom (CatPhan504 and Cheese) Megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) images acquired by Helical Tomotherapy with three scanning modes (Fine, Normal and Coarse), and to explore and validate a semi-automatic quality assurance procedure for MVCT images of Helical Tomotherapy.
METHODS:On Helical Tomotherapy, CatPan504 and Cheese phantoms were scanned with three pitch levels (Fine, Normal, Coarse: 4 mm, 8 mm, 12 mm/circle) respectively. Pylinac, Matlab and Eclipse were used to calculate and compare spatial resolution, noise level and low contrast resolution of images obtained under three scanning modes respectively. The spatial resolution can be evaluated by the blurring of line-pair CT value in the images of CatPhan504's CTP528 module. The noise level can be evaluated by the integral non-uniformity in the images of Cheese's uniformity module. the low contrast resolution can be evaluated by contrast-to-noise ratio of both phantoms' plug-in module, or visibility of the region of interest (Supra-Slice) in the images of CatPhan504's CTP515 module.
RESULTS:Analyses on CatPhan504's line pair module(CTP528 module) showed that the first three line pairs(the gap size are 0.500 cm, 0.250 cm and 0.167 cm respectively) could be clearly observed but blurring began to occur from the fourth line pair(the gap size is 0.125 cm) under Coarse mode. Meanwhile, the first four line pairs were all observable under the Normal and Fine modes. Integral non-integrity index(the value negatively correlated with the noise level) were 0.155 7, 0.136 8 and 0.122 9 for Coarse, Normal and Fine modes respectively. None of the Supra-Slice in CatPhan504's CTP515 module could be observed under three imaging modes. Low contrast contrast-to-noise ratio of Cheese phantom was similar under three modes and the insert visibility exhibited nearly linear growth with the increasing difference between CT average value of the insert material and background.
CONCLUSION:Superiority and inferiority of three image modes in terms of the three image quality index was not consistent. Evaluation results above could provide reference for more rational decision on scanning modes selection of helical tomotherapy, which was based on image visualization demands in clinical practice. The proposed method could also provide guidance for similar image quality assessment and periodic quality assurance.
