Interactions among Foot Placement, Trunk Control and Weight-bearing during Sit-to-stand Movement in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients
10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2015.09.021
- VernacularTitle:脑卒中偏瘫患者坐-站转移时足位、躯干运动及下肢负重间的关系
- Author:
Meng LIU
;
Chaomin NI
;
Jin CHEN
;
Wenxiang FAN
;
Jingsong MU
;
Li WANG
;
Jianhai ZHUANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
stroke, hemiplegia, sit-to-stand, foot placement, trunk control, weight-bearing
- From:
Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
2015;21(9):1082-1086
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To explore the interaction of foot placement, trunk control and weight-bearing (WB) during sit-to-stand (STS) movement. Methods 32 hemiplegic stroke patients (experimental group) and 32 healthy people (control group) were recruited and completed STS movement with 3 different foot positions: ankle dorsiflexed 10° of both feet (BF), with the paretic foot posterior (PFP) or the undominant foot posterior (UDFP), with the non-paretic foot posterior (NPFP) or the dominant foot posterior (DFP). Balance function assessment system (model AL-080) was used for collecting the WB, WB asymmetry (WBasym), and the center of pressure of the buttocks in medial-lateral (CoPx) and anterior-posterior (CoPy) sway during STS movement. Results The control group had the mostly WB symmetry, and little trunk side movement in BF, and there was significant difference in all indicators compared with in DFP or UDFP. For the experiment group, the WB, WBasym and CoPx were different as BF from as NPFP (P<0.05); while all the indicators except CoPx were different from PFP. When PFP, the trunk moved to the non-paretic side, and then to paretic side, all the indicators were different from NPFP. When BF and NPFP of the experiment group compared with BF and DFP of the control group, all the indicators were different (P<0.05). CoPx and CoPy increased in the experiment group compared with the control group. CoPx negatively correlate with WBasym in the experiment group (r=-0.626, P<0.001) and in the control group (r=-0.776, P<0.001). Conclusion The trunk side movement affects weight-bearing symmetry, and foot placement can modify weight-bearing distribution during the STS movement in hemiplegic stroke patients.
