Is pre-oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen safe? randomized control trial of 56 cases of elderly patients during induction of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.07.16
- Author:
Qing Xiang CAI
1
;
Wu Hua MA
1
;
Cai Neng WU
1
;
Hui Hui LIU
1
;
Shu Chen WANG
2
;
Guang Fang ZHANG
3
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China.
2. First Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China.
3. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China.
- Publication Type:Randomized Controlled Trial
- Keywords:
airway management;
gastric antrum cross-sectional area;
high-flow nasal oxygenation;
safety time of asphyxia
- MeSH:
Aged;
Anesthesia, General;
Asphyxia;
Humans;
Intubation, Intratracheal;
Oxygen;
Partial Pressure
- From:
Journal of Southern Medical University
2022;42(7):1069-1074
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the safety of preoxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygenation in elderly patients during induction of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
METHODS:Fifty-six elderly patients without difficult airway were randomized equally into high-flow nasal oxygen group (HF group) and conventional mask oxygen group (M group). Preoxygenation was performed for 5 min before induction of general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Oxygenation was maintained during laryngoscopy in HF group, and ventilation lasted until laryngoscopy in M group. For all the patients, the general data, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the gastric antrum measured by ultrasonography, arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) and arterial oxygen saturation (cSO2) were recorded before preoxygenation (T1), at 5 min of preoxygenation (T2) and immediately after intubation (T3). The safety time of asphyxia, intubation time, times of mask ventilation and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:The general data were comparable between the two groups. After 5 min of preoxygenation, PaO2 and cSO2 were significantly increased in both groups, and PaO2 was significantly higher in HF group than in M group (F=118.108 vs 9.511, P < 0.05). Both PaO2 and cSO2 decreased after intubation, but PaO2 decreased more slowly in HF group and still remained higher than that at T1; cSO2 decreased significantly in M group to a lower level than that at T1. Compared with those in M group, the patients in HF group showed a significantly longer safety time of asphyxia (t=5.305, P < 0.05) with fewer times of mask ventilation (χ2= 6.720, P < 0.05). PaCO2 increased after intubation in both groups but was comparable between the two groups (F=3.138, P > 0.05).
CONCLUSION:High-flow nasal oxygen is safe, simple and effective for pre-oxygenation, which, as compared with the conventional oxygen mask, improves arterial oxygen partial pressure and prolongs the safety time of asphyxia to ensure the safety of airway management during induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients with endotracheal intubation.
