Clinical observation on perioperative complications of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200704-00626
- Author:
Jian Ming ZHOU
1
;
Sheng Jie JING
1
;
Qi Tong LU
1
;
Xin CHU
1
;
Tao XUE
1
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasms;
Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy;
McKeown esophagectomy;
Minimally invasive esophagectomy;
Postoperative complications
- MeSH:
Anastomotic Leak/etiology*;
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery*;
Esophagectomy/adverse effects*;
Humans;
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects*;
Postoperative Complications/epidemiology*;
Retrospective Studies;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Oncology
2022;44(6):577-580
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To compare and analyze the perioperative clinical effects of minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIE-Ivor-Lewis) and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown). Methods: A total of 147 patients who underwent endoscopic esophageal cancer surgery from April 2018 to August 2019 were selected, including 85 patients undergoing MIE-McKeown surgery and 62 patients undergoing MIE-Ivor-Lewis surgery. The measurement data were expressed as (x±s), the comparison of normally distributed measurement data was performed by independent sample t-test, and the comparison of count data was performed by χ(2) test or Fisher's exact test. Results: The operation time of McKeown (M) group and Ivor-Lewis (IL) group were (219.2±72.4) minutes and (225.8±65.3) minutes. The mediastinal lymph node dissection number of M and IL groups were 13.3±4.8 and 11.6±6.5, respectively. The number of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection were 3.5±1.2 and 3.1±1.4, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss were (178.3±41.3) ml and (163.2±64.1) ml, respectively. The number of patients reoperated for postoperative bleeding were 1 and 0, respectively. The number of patients with postoperative gastric bleeding were 0 and 1, respectively. The postoperative chest tube retention time were (2.8±1.3) days and (3.1±1.2) days, respectively. The number of patients with anastomotic leakage were 7 and 1, respectively. The number of patients with lung infection were 13 and 5, respectively, and with chylothorax were 2 and 1, respectively, without statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The number of patients with hoarseness were 11 and 3, respectively. The total incidence of complication were 41.2% (35/85) and 17.7% (11/62), and the postoperative hospital stay were (14.7±6.5) days and (12.3±2.3) days, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: MIE-Ivor-Lewis and MIE-McKeown are safe and effective in treating esophageal cancer, but the complication of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is less than that of MIE-Mckeown, and the perioperative clinical effect of MIE-Ivor-Lewis is better than that of MIE-McKeown.
