ECG optimisation for CRT systems in the era of automatic algorithms: a comprehensive review
10.1186/s42444-022-00067-x
- Author:
Franco ZOPPO
1
,
2
;
Andrea COCCIOLO
;
Daniele MANGIAMELI
;
Luca PERAZZA
;
Andrea CORRADO
Author Information
1. Elettrofisiologia ‑ Unità Di Cardiologia
2. Ospedale Civile Gorizia (Italy), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASUGI), Via Fatebenefratelli 34, 34170 Gorizia, Italy
- Publication Type:REVIEW
- From:International Journal of Arrhythmia
2022;23(2):14-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) may fail in up to one third of patients, mainly due to anatomical and procedural issues. In the daily practice, ECG optimisation is largely used to address CRT delivery. Ineffective CRT can be related to non-optimal pacing timing as well as inadequate pacing-capture. A rate-competitive atrial fibrillation (AF) or a high daily burden of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) may also affect CRT by means of fusion or pseudo-fusion captures. Growing observations suggest that in a subset of patients with typical left bundle branch block (LBBB), selected LV pacing may be more effective, producing a complete fusion between the left pacing and the intrinsic right bundle activation. The His-ventricular (HV) interval is an invasive measurement (derived from electrophysiological study), which mainly reflects the RV activation (and its contribution to QRS timing) and has been proposed by some authors when addressing LV-paced–RV-sensed fusion. In sinus rhythm CRT patients, with baseline typical LBBB criteria and preserved AV conduction, the “dromotropic” management to achieve RV intrinsic activation with LV fusion is also “AV delay dependent”. In this regard, the RV intrinsic activation (detected by RV sensing) and the A (paced/sensed)-RV (sensed) interval are also influenced by the RV lead position within the RV. The current families of CRT devices have implemented automatic algorithms to optimise AV and VV timing intervals. The proof of principle is again the evidence that fusion of an LV-paced beat with intrinsic rhythm may be more beneficial than standard biventricular pacing, provided a preserved AV conduction. In the present review, all the above issues are discussed.
