A Study of Factors That Promote Patients’ Provision of Information to Pharmacists and Evaluation Items for Evaluating Patients’ Willingness to Provide Information
- VernacularTitle:薬局における患者の薬剤師への情報提供の促進要因及び患者の情報提供積極性の評価項目の検討
- Author:
Keiko KISHIMOTO
1
;
Ryota KUMAKI
1
;
Chika KIYOZUKA
1
;
Hidehiko SAKURAI
2
Author Information
- Keywords: pharmacy; patient; communication; provision of information; relationship of mutual trust
- From:Japanese Journal of Social Pharmacy 2022;41(1):45-55
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
- Abstract: The purpose of this study was to identify patient-side factors that facilitate their provision of information to pharmacists (Survey A) and identify questions to assess their willingness to provide information to pharmacies (Survey B). Two web-based surveys were conducted among individuals aged 50-79 years who regularly brought their prescriptions to pharmacies. Survey A was conducted in February 2020 with 540 respondents. Multiple regression analysis was conducted, with “patients’ provision of information to pharmacies” as the objective variable. Survey B was conducted in November 2020 with 126 respondents for each three patterns of questions regarding “patients’ provision of information to pharmacies.” The distribution of responses was compared. More than half of the respondents were willing to provide information to pharmacists on the contents of the initial questionnaire. In contrast, less than half of the respondents were willing to provide information about the physician’s explanation of drug treatment, history of the disease, concerns and consultations about medication, blood tests results, and unusual symptoms. Factors on the patients’ side that promoted the provision of information included having a family pharmacist, a sense of trust in the pharmacist, recognition as a medical professional, and understanding the pharmacist’s work. As an indicator to evaluate the increase in patients’ willingness to provide information, the questionnaire statement “I will actively tell the pharmacist about [ ].” was found to be appropriate. Words such as a physician’s explanation of drug treatment, history of the disease were included in [ ].
