Impact of vaginal delivery history on anesthesia management of hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia: a cohort study of 99 patients.
10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2022.04.16
- Author:
Xiao Meng YU
1
;
Ying GUO
1
;
Mao Wei GONG
1
;
Miao Miao WANG
1
;
Zhi Feng YAN
2
;
Li SUN
1
;
Jing Sheng LOU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Anesthesiology, First Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Medical Center, General Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100853, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
anesthesia management;
hysteroscopic surgery;
intravenous general anesthesia;
prospective cohort Study;
vaginal delivery history
- MeSH:
Anesthesia, General;
Anesthesia, Intravenous;
Anesthetics, Intravenous;
Cohort Studies;
Delivery, Obstetric;
Female;
Humans;
Hysteroscopy;
Pregnancy;
Propofol
- From:
Journal of Southern Medical University
2022;42(4):591-597
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the impact of a history of vaginal delivery on anesthesia management of patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation.
METHODS:Ninety-nine patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia were enrolled in this study, including 43 patients with (VD group) and 56 patients without a history of vaginal delivery (NVD group). For all the patients, blood pressure, heart rate (HR), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded before anesthesia (T1), after anesthesia (T2), after cervical dilation (T3), and at 3 min after cervical dilation (T4). Propofol and etomidate doses during anesthesia induction, the total dose of propofol administered, additional intraoperative bolus dose and times of propofol, intraoperative body movement, total operation time and surgeons' satisfaction feedback scores were compared between the two groups. The postoperative awake time, recovery time, VAS score at 30 min after operation, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were also compared.
RESULTS:There was no significant differences in SBP, DBP, HR, SpO2, or BIS between the two groups at T1 and T2, but at T3 and T4, SBP and DBP were significantly higher in NVD group than in VD group (P < 0.01); HR was significantly higher in NVD group only at T3 (P < 0.01). The application of vasoactive drugs did not differ significantly between the two groups. The total dose of propofol, additional intraoperative dose and times of propofol were all greater in NVD group than in VD group (P < 0.01). More body movements of the patients were observed in NVD group (P < 0.01), which also had lower surgeons' satisfaction score for anesthesia (P < 0.01), higher postoperative VAS score (P < 0.05), and shorter postoperative awake time (P < 0.05) and recovery time (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION:A history of vaginal delivery has a significant impact on anesthesia management of patients undergoing hysteroscopic surgery under intravenous general anesthesia without tracheal intubation in terms of hemodynamic changes, anesthetic medication, and postoperative recovery quality, suggesting the necessity of individualized anesthesia management for these patients.
