Real-world study evaluating the incidence of liver damage conditions in patients with primary liver cancer using immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy.
10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20210910-00466
- VernacularTitle:评估免疫检查点抑制剂为基础的联合治疗在原发性肝癌患者中肝损伤发生情况的真实世界研究
- Author:
Ya Qiu HU
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
;
Ni WANG
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
;
Xi Ping RAN
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
;
Da Chuan CAI
1
,
2
,
3
,
4
Author Information
1. Department of Infectious Diseases, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
2. Institute for Viral Hepatitis, Chongqing Medical University
3. Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Education
4. Chongqing 400010, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Immune checkpoint inhibitors;
Immune therapy;
Immune-related adverse events;
Liver damage;
PD-1/PD-L1 antibody;
Primary cancer
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors;
Incidence;
Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology*;
Male;
Retrospective Studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatology
2022;30(1):57-62
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the incidence of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy-induced liver damage in patients with primary liver cancer. Methods: Clinical data of 65 hospitalized cases of primary liver cancer treated with programmed cell death-1 its ligand programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) antibody in the Department of Infectious Diseases of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The degree of liver injury before and after treatment was assessed according to CTCAE v5.0. Patients were grouped according to gender, age, presence or absence of cirrhosis, baseline Child-Pugh score, BCLC stage, and treatment regimen to compare the incidence of liver injury under different conditions. The χ (2) test or rank-sum test was used for comparison among multiple groups. Results: 46 cases (70.77%) had liver damage of any grade according to the CTCAE V5.0 criteria during the treatment and observation period. All 6 cases who received standardized anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment developed liver damage. 10 (15.38%), 15 (23.08%), 19 (29.23%), and 2 (3.08%) cases had grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 liver damage respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of liver damage between male and female patients (68.33% and 100%, P = 0.180). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of liver damage among different age groups (P = 0.245). The incidence of liver damage in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic group was 72.22%, and 63.64% (P = 0.370), respectively. The incidence of liver damage in patients with baseline Child-Pugh class A, B, and C were 71.43%, 61.11% and 100%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.878). The incidence of liver damage was not statistically significantly different under different BCLC stages (P = 1.000). The incidence of liver damage in the PD-1/PD-L1 antibody monotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with targeted drug therapy, and PD-1/PD-L1 antibody combined with TACE/radiofrequency ablation treatment group were 60.00%, 67.85%, and 86.67%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of liver damage between the treatment regimen (P = 0.480). Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy-induced liver damage is common in patients with primary liver cancer; however, it rarely severely endangers the patient's life. Additionally, patient's gender, age, presence or absence of cirrhosis, baseline liver function, BCLC stage and the immunotherapy regimen has no effect on the incidence of immune-related liver damage.
