Emergency psychological intervention of acute ammonia leakage event.
10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20201116-00631
- Author:
Shuai ZHANG
1
;
Xiang Dong JIAN
2
;
Kai Cheng YANG
1
;
Zhe ZHANG
1
;
Ting YIN
1
;
Ying JIN
1
Author Information
1. Emergency Department of Zhangqiu District People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical College, Jinan 250200, China.
2. Department of Poisoning and Occupational Diseases, Emergency Department of Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Acute;
Ammonia leakage;
Case report;
Field hygiene;
Investigation and analysis;
Poisoning accidents;
Psychological intervention
- MeSH:
Ammonia;
Anxiety;
Anxiety Disorders;
Humans;
Psychosocial Intervention
- From:
Chinese Journal of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases
2022;40(1):72-74
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the situation of emergency psychological intervention in an acute ammonia leakage event, and to provide reference for emergency response. Methods: In August 2020, the emergency treatment of 65 patients admitted by Zhangqiu District People's Hospital Affiliated to Jining Medical College of Shandong Province in June 2019 in the ammonia tank car leakage incident was analyzed, the psychological intervention in emergency after the incident was collected, the anxiety and depression were evaluated by symptom checklist 90 (SCL-90) , and targeted psychological intervention was implemented according to the psychological evaluation results, And analyze the intervention efficiency. Results: Among the 65 patients, there were 52 cases of ammonia stimulation reaction, 11 cases of mild poisoning and 2 cases of moderate poisoning. There were 60 cases of chest tightness and dyspnea, 11 cases of bloody sputum, 58 cases of sore throat, 43 cases of hoarseness, 28 cases of photophobia and tears, 13 cases of blurred vision, 18 cases of nausea and vomiting, and 2 cases of dry and wet rales in the lungs. The scores of somatization, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobia, paranoia and negative coping in patients with mild and moderate poisoning were higher than those in patients with stimulus response (P<0.05) . The effective rate of intervention was 98.7%. Conclusion: Emergency psychological evaluation and intervention in mass public health events are helpful to the treatment of patients.
