Current application of antibiotic de-escalation treatment in children with sepsis and its impact on prognosis.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20211111-00945
- VernacularTitle:脓毒症抗菌药物降阶梯治疗的应用现状及其对结局的影响
- Author:
Yan ZHAO
1
;
Ni YANG
1
;
Chun Feng LIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Pediatrics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use*;
Child;
Female;
Humans;
Infant;
Male;
Prognosis;
Retrospective Studies;
Sepsis/drug therapy*;
Shock, Septic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
2022;60(3):203-208
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the eligibility of empirical antibiotic therapy in culture positive sepsis in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and to explore the application of antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) in children with sepsis and its impact on prognosis. Methods: A total of 123 children with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction or septic shock admitted to the PICU of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The general information, laboratory tests, the use of empirical anti-bacterial drugs and the application of ADE were collected. According to the adjustment of anti-bacterial drugs, these children were divided into ADE group and non-ADE group. Comparisons between groups were performed with unpaired Student t test, or Mann-Whitney U test, or chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Results: In these 123 children, 70 were males and 53 were females, the age was 11.4 (2.8, 56.5) months. Body fluid culture was detected positive in 41 children including 3 children (7.3%) who received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy and 38 children (92.7%) who received adequate empirical antibiotic therapy. Excluding 10 children who received appropriate therapy, 28 received unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotics. There were no significant differences regarding the PICU all-cause mortality rates, length of PICU stay, hospitalization cost, duration of mechanical ventilation, as well as incidences of re-infection between the ADE group (n=46) and non-ADE group (n=77) (all P>0.05). However, among the 101 children who have used antibiotics against multidrug-resistant organism, the duration of such antibiotics use in ADE group (n=43) was shorter than that in non-ADE group (n=58) (5.0 (4.0, 12.0) vs. 9.5 (7.0, 13.0) d, Z=-3.14, P=0.002). Conclusions: Overuse of unnecessary broad-spectrum empirical antibiotics is very common, but the application of ADE is rather disappointing. ADE can reduce the use of anti-bacterial drugs against multi-drug resistant bacteria without significant adverse effects on prognosis in children with sepsis.
