Clinical outcomes analysis of fertility-preserving therapy for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial carcinoma.
10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20201014-00897
- Author:
Yi Jiao HE
1
;
Yi Qin WANG
1
;
Yi Bo DAI
1
;
Rong ZHOU
1
;
Qun LU
1
;
Guo Li LIU
1
;
Jian Liu WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Atypical endometrial hyperplasia;
Endometrial carcinoma;
Fertility-preserving;
Pregnancy outcome;
Progesterone
- MeSH:
Endometrial Hyperplasia/surgery*;
Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery*;
Female;
Fertility;
Fertility Preservation;
Humans;
Pregnancy;
Retrospective Studies
- From:
Chinese Journal of Oncology
2022;44(3):291-296
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective: To analyze the clinical efficacy of fertility-preserving therapy in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial carcinoma (EC). Methods: The general condition, pathological type, treatment plan, tumor outcomes and pregnancy outcomes of 110 patients with AEH and EC treated with fertility-preserving therapy in Peking University People's Hospital from December 2005 to September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Log rank tests were used for survival analysis. Results: The response rate of 110 cases of AEH (62 cases) and EC (48 cases) was 94.5% (104/110) after fertility-preserving therapy. There were 93 cases (84.5%) achieved complete response and 11 cases (10.0%) achieved partial response, and the recurrence rate was 29.0% (27/93). The complete response rates of AEH and EC were 90.3% (56/62) and 77.1% (37/48), respectively, without significant difference (P=0.057). The recurrence rates of EC were significantly higher than that of AEH (40.5% vs 21.4%; P=0.022). Forty-one patients with complete response had pregnancy intention, the pregnancy rate was 70.7% (29/41), and the live birth rate was 56.1% (23/41). The live birth rate of AEH was 68.2% (15/22) and that of EC was 42.1% (8/19), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.032). The pathological type was related with the recurrence (P=0.044). Conclusions: Patients with AEH and EC can obtain high complete response rate and pregnancy rate after fertility-preserving therapy. The recurrence rate of EC is higher than that of AEH, while the live birth rate of AEH is higher than that of EC.
