Modified retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized transitional zone prostate cancer
10.3760/cma.j.cn112330-20210413-00191
- VernacularTitle:改良后入路机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗移行带前列腺癌的安全性和疗效
- Author:
Linfeng XU
1
;
Xuefeng QIU
;
Qing ZHANG
;
Feifei ZHANG
;
Yifan SUN
;
Yang YANG
;
Hongqian GUO
Author Information
1. 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院泌尿外科 南京大学泌尿外科学研究所，南京 210008
- Keywords:
Prostatic neoplasm;
Robotic Surgical;
Laparoscope;
Prostatectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Urology
2022;43(2):107-110
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized transitional zone prostate cancer.Methods:From May 2019 to February 2021, the clinical data of 284 patients with transitional zone(TZ) prostate cancer was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 91 cases underwent modified Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy(modified RS-RARP), and 193 cases underwent conventional robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP). The Retzius space was directly entered during modified RS-RARP.The mean age of modified RS-RARP group and conventional RARP group was (67.8±9.1) years old and (69.5±8.4) years old, respectively. BMI of the two groups was (21.57±2.25)kg/m 2 and (21.8±1.8)kg/m 2 respectively; prostate volume was (31.2±13.5)ml and (29.3±12.9)ml respectively; preoperative PSA of the two groups were (10.2±6.1)ng/ml and (9.3±5.8)ng/ml respectively; and there was no significant difference in the above mentioned data( P>0.05). For Gleason score, there were 8 cases of score 6, 74 cases of score 7, 9 cases of score 8 in modified RS-RARP group and 21 cases of score 6, 153 cases of score 7, 19 cases of score 8 in conventional RARP group. For Clinical stage, there were 11 cases of T 1 stage, 80 cases of T 2 stage in modified RS-RARP group, and 20 cases of T 1 stage, 173 cases of T 2 stage in conventional RARP group. There was no significant difference in the above mentioned data( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ratio of transfusion, incidence of complication, positive rate of surgical margin and recovery of urinary continence were compared. Results:All 284 cases of surgery were completed. The operative time of modified RS-RARP was (89.2±10.1) minutes, which was significantly less than that of conventional RARP group[(100.5±12.3)min]. The intraoperative blood loss of the two groups was (245.0±50.0) ml and (250.0±50.0) ml respectively. The number of positive surgical margin was 14(15.4%) and 33(17.1%) respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groupsfor the above mentioned parameters( P>0.05). The ratio of urinary continence recovery in the modified RS-RARP group within 1 month was 49.45%, which was significantly higher than that of conventional RARP group (31.09%)( P<0.05). Conclusions:Compared with conventional RARP, modified RS-RARP might shorten the operation time and help the recovery of urinary continence for patients with TZ prostate cancer.
