The distribution of bone cement in the vertebral body after percutaneous vertebral augmentation for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20210129-00089
- VernacularTitle:骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体强化术后椎体内骨水泥分布类型的研究进展
- Author:
Benqiang TANG
1
;
Yanhui WANG
;
Songjie XU
;
Libin CUI
;
Xin YUAN
;
Yadong LIU
;
Xueming CHEN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院脊柱外科，北京 101149
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2022;42(5):320-330
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Percutaneous vertebral augmentation, including percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous kyphoplasty, has been considered as an effective and safe option in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The fractured vertebrae were strengthened by the bone cement injected, thus reducing the symptoms related to fracture. Bone cement injected intraoperatively can be divided into extraspinal (leakage) and intraspinal part, depending on its final location. The former may lead to pulmonary embolism, spinal cord or nerve injury, or some other sequelae; the latter may closely relate to the clinical outcome, radiological outcomes, surgical complications and biomechanical properties. To date, there were a large number of studies on term of the distribution type of bone cement. However, the classification criteria varied and there was lack of literature review on this issue. According to the literature reviewed, the distribution type of bone cement was a critical parameter in percutaneous vertebral augmentation; most classification systems were based on the postoperative X-ray, some based on the postoperative CT, and only a few based on postoperative MRI; in different classification systems, criteria on bone cement morphology tends to be consistent, however, criteria on bone cement range tends to be inconsistent, consistency, similarity and controversy all exited among conclusions between various studies on the morphology and range of bone cement; any single classification system can not describe the distribution of bone cement thoroughly. In this study, classification systems were reviewed, clinical significance and biomechanical conclusions of different classification systems were documented, and the reliability and limitations of classification systems were summarized, hence providing an insight for further research on classifications of the bone cement distribution.
