A retrospective comparative study on the therapeutic effect of one-stage means two-stage percutaneous transhepatic biliary fistulation lithotripsy in treatment of complex hepatolithiasis
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20211211-00409
- VernacularTitle:经皮经肝一期胆道造瘘取石术与分期经皮经肝胆道镜取石术治疗复杂肝胆管结石的疗效比较
- Author:
Canhua ZHU
1
;
Junhua CEN
;
Ping WANG
;
Yi HU
Author Information
1. 广州医科大学附属第一医院肝胆外科，广州 510120
- Keywords:
Gallstones;
Percutaneous transhepatic fistulation;
Choledochoscope
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2022;28(3):166-170
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the therapeutic effect of one-stage versus two-stage percutaneous transhepatic biliary fistulation lithotripsy in treatment of complex hepatolithiasis.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 145 patients with complex hepatolithiasis who were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between September 2013 and June 2018. There were 60 males and 85 females, aged 21 to 91 (56.5±14.1) years. According to the method of fistula establishment, patients were divided into the percutaneous transhepatic one-step biliary fistulation (PTOBF) group ( n=94) or the two-stage percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopic lithotripsy (PTCSL) group ( n=51). The success rates of one-time puncture and fistula dilation, operation time of lithotripsy, operative conversion rate (PTCSL was converted to laparotomy and laparoscopic surgery), postoperative complications (including catheter dislodgement), residual stone rates and stone recurrence rates were compared between groups. Results:In the PTOBF group, operation time (105.8±43.6) min, success rate of one puncture 73.4% (69/94), and success rate of one fistula dilation 93.6% (88/94), the rate of operative conversion 0. All these results were significantly better than the corresponding results of the two-stage PTCSL group of (130.0±70.0) min, 54.9% (28/51), 68.6% (35/51), and 13.7%(7/51) respectively (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences in stone residual rate [17.0%(16/94) vs. 15.7% (8/51)] and stone recurrence rate [14.9%(14/94) vs. 17.6% (9/51)] between groups (both P>0.05). The postoperative complications rate was 7.4%(7/94) in PTOBF group, which was 39.2% (20/51) in two-stage PTCSL group (χ 2=22.02, P<0.001). The catheter dislodgement rate of PTOBF group was 2.1% (2/94), lower than that of two-stage PTCSL group 27.4% (14/51), the difference was statistically significant (χ 2=21.59, P<0.001). Conclusion:One-stage PTOBF and two-stage PTCSL were both safe and effective in treatment of complex hepatolithiasis. However, PTOBF had shorter operative times, lower catheter dislodgement and operative conversion rates than PTCSL.
