Safety and efficacy of the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy
10.3760/cma.j.cn113884-20210429-00150
- VernacularTitle:控制性第一肝门阻断法在肝切除手术中的安全性和有效性
- Author:
Jun XIA
1
;
Ran JIA
;
Yeben QIAN
;
Yechuan XU
;
Chao ZHANG
Author Information
1. 安徽医科大学第一附属医院肝胆外科，合肥 230032
- Keywords:
Hepatectomy;
Reperfusion injury;
Block of the liver blood inflow
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hepatobiliary Surgery
2021;27(12):889-893
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To determine the safety and efficacy of controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion in hepatectomy.Methods:Patients who underwent hepatectomy from 1 September 2018 to 1 September 2020 at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University were studied. There were 133 males and 70 females, with age of (52.9±19.2) years old. They were prospectively randomized into three groups: the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group ( n=72), the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group ( n=66) and the selective portal vein occlusion group ( n=65). The clinical data of these three groups before, during and after operation were analysed. Results:The amount of intraoperative bleeding in the selective portal vein occlusion group was significantly more than the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group [(226.7±117.9) vs. (115.7±84.2) ml, P<0.05] and the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(226.7±117.9) vs. (128.1±103.6) ml, P<0.05]. The total duration of operation in the selective portal vein occlusion group was significantly longer than the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group [(173.6±51.7) vs. (128.4±36.5) min, P<0.05] and the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(173.6±51.7) vs. (136.1±40.7) min, P<0.05]. The postoperative data showed the AST indexes on day 1 after surgery to be significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group with the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(587.5±189.2) vs. (361.2±158.3) U/L, P<0.05], and the selective portal vein occlusion group [(587.5±189.2) vs. (358.2±162.7) U/L, P<0.05]. The ALT indexes on day 1 after surgery were significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group with the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group [(609.4±172.5) vs. (414.8±162.2) U/L, P<0.05], and the selective portal vein occlusion group[(609.4±172.5) vs. (395.6±158.7) U/L, P<0.05]. The AST and ALT indexes on day 3 after surgery were significantly different between the intermittent Pringle’s maneuver group the controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion group, and the selective portal vein occlusion group. Other liver functions, postoperative complications and recovery indexes showed no significantly differences among the three groups. Conclusions:All the three methods of hepatic blood flow occlusion were safe and efficacious. The controlled first hepaticportal blood flow occlusion method was simple to use and it provided some protective effect in alleviating hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury.
