Pregnancy outcomes in patients with adenomyosis with fertility requirements: retrospective analysis of clinical data from real world
10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20210830-00475
- VernacularTitle:有生育要求子宫腺肌病患者的妊娠结局真实世界临床数据分析
- Author:
Changmei SANG
1
;
Qiuling SHI
;
Yanjun KANG
;
Limei CUI
;
Kun DING
;
Xiaoqiang LIU
;
Shuping ZHAO
Author Information
1. 青岛大学附属妇女儿童医院妇科中心，青岛 266011
- Keywords:
Adenomyosis;
Pregnancy outcome;
Pregnancy complications;
Clinical protocols
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2022;57(4):265-270
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To retrospectively analyze the pregnancy outcomes of patients with adenomyosis requiring fertility in a single center under real world condition.Methods:From June 2015 to May 2020, 231 cases of pregnancy complicated with adenomyosis diagnosed by ultrasound with fertility requirements were treated in the Women′s and Children′s Hospital Affiliated to Qingdao University with complete clinical data. And they were divided into three groups according to the treatment of adenomyosis before pregnancy: expectation group, drug group and operation group. The relevant data before pregnancy of the three groups were analyzed, and the pregnancy outcomes of the patients were summarized. According to whether the early pregnancy was treated with medication, the patients who were naturally conceived without symptoms of threatened abortion were divided into observation group and fetus protection group, and the pregnancy outcomes of the two groups were compared.Results:(1) Compared with the expectation group, the ages of patients in the drug group and the operation group were larger [(31.5±1.8) vs (34.1±3.7) vs (36.9±3.6) years old], and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Only 9 patients (11.5%, 9/78) had clinical symptoms in the expectation group, while the patients in the drug group and the operation group had a higher proportion of dysmenorrhea and increased menstrual volume. The uterine volume of the drug group and the operation group were larger than that of the expectation group [(151±46) vs (166±27) vs (97±18) cm 3], the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). 78.6% (33/42) of the operation group were focal adenomyosis. The proportion of natural pregnancy in the expectation group was 97.4% (76/78), and in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer was mainly used in the drug group and the operation group. (2) The abortion rates of the three groups were 48.7% (26/111), 4/17, 67.5% (27/78) respectively. Compared with the drug group and the operation group, the preterm birth rate was lower [55.9% (33/111) vs 11/17 vs 12.5% (5/78)] and the natural delivery rate was higher [44.1% (26/111) vs 4/17 vs 67.5% (27/78)] in the expectation group. (3) There were 89 cases of spontaneous pregnancy without threatened abortion symptoms, including 31 cases in the observation group and 58 cases in the fetus protection group. Compared with the observation group, the abortion rate of patients in the fetus protection group was lower [41.9% (13/31) vs 34.5% (20/58)], and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). Conclusions:Patients with adenomyosis who have fertility requirements should be comprehensively evaluated and individualized treatment plans should be given. Pregnancy patients with adenomyosis have a high rate of miscarriage, and they should be included in the management of high-risk pregnant women. Active fetal protection treatment during early pregnancy might improve pregnancy outcomes.
