Three osteotomy methods and bone healing in Ilizarov tibial bone transport
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210310-00124
- VernacularTitle:三种截骨方式对胫骨骨搬移术愈合的影响分析
- Author:
Zichen LYU
1
;
Bin WANG
;
Shunhong GAO
;
Huiren LIU
;
Zhenxing TU
;
Jun FANG
Author Information
1. 唐山市第二医院（华北理工大学附属骨科医院）手外科，唐山 063000
- Keywords:
Ilizarov technique;
Osteotomy;
Tibia;
Bone transport;
Osteotomy methods;
Bone healing index
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2022;24(4):339-344
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effects of 3 osteotomy methods on the bone healing in Ilizarov tibial bone transport.Methods:The data of 93 patients were retrospectively reviewed who had been treated by Ilizarov single-segment tibial bone transport at Department of Hand Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tangshan from December 2003 to April 2019. Minimally invasive osteotomy was performed in 16 patients [group A: 16 males with an age of (37.1±8.3) years; 5 cases of type Ⅱ and 11 ones of type Ⅲ by Gustilo classification], subperiosteal saw osteotomy in 57 patients [group B: 47 males and 10 females with an age of (39.1±11.8) years; 17 cases of type Ⅱ and 40 ones of type Ⅲ by Gustilo classification] and extraperiosteal wire saw osteotomy in 20 patients [group C: 19 males and one female with an age of (37.7±11.2) years; 18 cases of type Ⅱ and 2 cases of type Ⅲ by Gustilo classification]. The 3 groups were compared in terms of the bone healing index and the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) functional scores.Results:The 3 groups were comparable because there was no significant difference in the preoperative general data between them ( P>0.05). All the patients were followed up for 19 to 50 months (average, 27.4 months). All patients achieved bony healing, and their associated complications were cured after corresponding treatments. There were no significant differences in the bone healing index between the 3 groups [(53.09±21.88) d/cm for group A, (59.97±33.29) d/cm for group B and (46.20±14.11) d/cm for group C] ( P>0.05). There were no significant differences either in the good to excellent rate by the ASAMI functional scores between the 3 groups (87.5% for group A, 89.5% for group B and 90.0% for group C) ( P> 0.05). Conclusion:All the 3 osteotomy methods may achieve good bony union, leading to similar bone healing indexes and postoperative functional scores.
