Comparison of efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between small-sized and normal-sized patients using grafts of different diameters
10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20210201-00058
- VernacularTitle:体型偏小患者与体型正常患者应用不同直径移植物重建前交叉韧带的疗效比较
- Author:
Shaozheng YANG
1
;
Jianying PAN
;
Jianyi LI
;
Chun ZENG
Author Information
1. 南方医科大学第三附属医院关节/运动医学科，广州 510630
- Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament;
Reconstruction;
Diameter of the graft;
Height;
Weight
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
2021;23(12):1091-1096
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the therapeutic outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between small-sized and normal-sized patients using grafts of different diameters.Methods:The data of 63 patients were selected who had undergone ACL reconstruction at Department of Joint/Sports Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital to Southern Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018. They were divided into 2 groups according to body size. In the observation group of 26 small-sized patients who were shorter and lighter, there were 18 males and 8 females with an age of (29.4±8.5) years and a graft of 7.5 mm in diameter was used. In the control group of 37 normal-sized patients, there were 26 males and 11 females with an age of (28.8±8.2) years and a graft of 8.0 mm in diameter was used. The 2 groups were compared in terms of failure rate, kinematic changes in the affected knee joint (taking the 63 normal knee joints in the 2 groups as controls), isokinetic muscle strength and Lysholm knee score.Results:There was no significant difference in the general data or follow-up time between the 2 groups other than height and weight ( P>0.05), indicating comparability between the 2 groups. In the control and observation groups, the failure rates were 2.7% (1/37) and 3.8% (1/26), and the Lysholm knee scores 2 years after surgery (86.6±10.1) points and (90.2±6.9) points, respectively, showing no statistical significance ( P>0.05). The range of flexion and extension was 56.30° (51.10°, 58.10°) in the observation group, significantly smaller than that in the control group [60.15°(58.95°, 63.08°)] and that for a normal knee joint [59.00° (56.45°, 63.00°]; the internal and external displacement in the observation group [7.30 (5.30, 8.30) mm] was significantly smaller than that for a normal knee joint [9.00 (7.00, 12.00) mm]; the external rotation in the observation group [0.97°(-1.59°, 3.01°)] was significantly larger than that for a normal knee joint [-1.54°(-5.30°, 2.28°)]; the knee extension muscle strength at 60°/s in the observation group was (65%±19%), significantly smaller than that in the control group (78%±18%) (all P<0.05). Conclusion:When small-sized and normal-sized patients use a 7.5 mm graft and a 8.0 mm graft respectively in ACL reconstruction, similar therapeutic outcomes can be expected.
